| 發表文章 | 發起投票 |
| 上一頁 |
膠登仔不得不知的劃時代科學神人 -Tesla
Nikola Tesla
尼古拉．特斯拉Nikola Tesla（1856-1943）。
小時候與生平總結
1856年7月10日，他誕生於前南斯拉夫克羅地亞的斯米良，( Smiljan, Austrian Empire (modern-day Croatia) )
他父親是一所教堂裏的牧師，自小就在基督教(東正教) 的家庭裏長大。1880年畢業於布拉格大學後，於1884年移民美國成為美國公民，並獲取耶魯大學及哥倫比亞大學名譽博士學位。 他一生的發明多不勝數，
有超過 700 份 patents
http://www.teslasociety.com/tesla_achievements.htm
就如： 1882年，他繼「愛迪生」發明直流電（DC）後不久，即發明了交流電（AC），並製造出世界上第一台交流電發電機，並始創多相傳電技術。
1882年，第一個發明 rotating magnetic field ，啟發左 AC MOtor , Transformer , Generator 既發明
http://teslasociety.com/magnetic.htm
1895年，他替美國尼加拉瓜發電站製造發電機組，致使該發電站至今仍是世界著名水電站之一。
http://www.teslasociety.com/teslawestinghouse.htm
1897年，他使馬可尼的「無線傳訊」理論成為現實。
1898年，他又發明無線電搖控技術並取得專利（美國專利號碼#613.809）。
1899年，他發明了Ｘ光（Ｘ-Ray）攝影技術。其他發明包括：收音機、雷達、傳真機、真空管、霓虹光管……等甚至以他名字而命名的磁力線密度單位（1 Tesla = 10,000 Gause）更表明他在磁力學上的貢獻。 為何這麼非凡的科學家倣似從未有歷史記載呢？從未有人傳頌？ 答案就是因為他那些另類「未知的發明」
1901-1905 年 , 第一個無線通信系統 - Wardenclyffe Tower (Tesla's Wireless World System)
http://www.teslasociety.com/teslashorelab.htm
雖然對人類有着重大的貢獻，但與此同時卻促使很多「賺錢」的企業瞬間結業。
所以他的名字將永遠被抹去了。
本貼文共有 169 個回覆
此貼文已鎖，將不接受回覆
留名
As a response to your previous post addressing mine months ago. ![[sosad]](/face/hkg/sosad.gif)
1. Something can never be proven, logically processed, or judged. Scientific facts and theories can be put to test, and theories are reliable enough to be trusted as universal and consistent. This doesn't apply to conspiracy however. Do you really understand what you have said, about electromagnetism bending light for invisibility whatever? It is possible that you can't judge it due to your lack of knowledge, or stuff is too ambiguous to be understood correctly. And this is how conspiracy works. Ambiguity plus a willing mind.
2. I'm fine with those conspiracy, if you believe it, then it's okay. I just don't like how you make your claims look like indisputable facts. Some of them may have actually happened, but some are also heavily exaggerated. I know it's only a matter of faith, you and I believe in different sides of the story, but keep in mind that these days lots of teenagers are dwelling on the net, and they sure as hell ain't gonna read through all the materials listed as "evidence" (even some of those are questionable). I just hope you know what you are saying, as it appears that you may have no idea what some of those Tesla theories actually claim (and why it's not legit), and that obviously will hinder your judgement.
As a side note, the so called "Philadelphia Experiment" was held in Oct 1943; Tesla died in Jan 1943.
Of course, you can keep saying that he did with the theories and plannings beforehand etc.
Always have room for ambiguity....
1. Something can never be proven, logically processed, or judged. Scientific facts and theories can be put to test, and theories are reliable enough to be trusted as universal and consistent. This doesn't apply to conspiracy however. Do you really understand what you have said, about electromagnetism bending light for invisibility whatever? It is possible that you can't judge it due to your lack of knowledge, or stuff is too ambiguous to be understood correctly. And this is how conspiracy works. Ambiguity plus a willing mind.
2. I'm fine with those conspiracy, if you believe it, then it's okay. I just don't like how you make your claims look like indisputable facts. Some of them may have actually happened, but some are also heavily exaggerated. I know it's only a matter of faith, you and I believe in different sides of the story, but keep in mind that these days lots of teenagers are dwelling on the net, and they sure as hell ain't gonna read through all the materials listed as "evidence" (even some of those are questionable). I just hope you know what you are saying, as it appears that you may have no idea what some of those Tesla theories actually claim (and why it's not legit), and that obviously will hinder your judgement.
As a side note, the so called "Philadelphia Experiment" was held in Oct 1943; Tesla died in Jan 1943.
Of course, you can keep saying that he did with the theories and plannings beforehand etc.
Always have room for ambiguity....
WernerBB 一鍵留名！
睇緊時諗起 The Prestige 頂尖對決 個科學家 之後google下 原來真係
睇完覺得其實 The Prestige係影射緊Tesla 同 Edison
不過科學上既成就完全無得比
As a response to your previous post addressing mine months ago.
1. Something can never be proven, logically processed, or judged. Scientific facts and theories can be put to test, and theories are reliable enough to be trusted as universal and consistent. This doesn't apply to conspiracy however. Do you really understand what you have said, about electromagnetism bending light for invisibility whatever? It is possible that you can't judge it due to your lack of knowledge, or stuff is too ambiguous to be understood correctly. And this is how conspiracy works. Ambiguity plus a willing mind.
2. I'm fine with those conspiracy, if you believe it, then it's okay. I just don't like how you make your claims look like indisputable facts. Some of them may have actually happened, but some are also heavily exaggerated. I know it's only a matter of faith, you and I believe in different sides of the story, but keep in mind that these days lots of teenagers are dwelling on the net, and they sure as hell ain't gonna read through all the materials listed as "evidence" (even some of those are questionable). I just hope you know what you are saying, as it appears that you may have no idea what some of those Tesla theories actually claim (and why it's not legit), and that obviously will hinder your judgement.
As a side note, the so called "Philadelphia Experiment" was held in Oct 1943; Tesla died in Jan 1943.
Of course, you can keep saying that he did with the theories and plannings beforehand etc.
Always have room for ambiguity....
1. Of course scientific discovery are independent to the conspiracy. What if some of the implication and hence the theory are extracted by the malicious organisations ?
2. Conspiracy was still a bullshit if there were only a few to speak the incident. What if there were more and more documentaries, news and hearsays found to support the conspiracy? Sometimes the majority views could be wrong, I'd rather find more evidence to believe this. In the most of the cases, it is proved to be real afterwards, such as Monsanto, Mao , and so on.
3. Philadelphia Experiment actually started in 1938 , and he is the one in charge. He had conducted the experiment for only dead objects and animals. He has found that there were fleet wall and animals mixed together. Then, he was warned by aliens so that he stopped and destroyed all the apparatus. He rejected the request from US Army to continue the experiment with humans. The US Army assigned Einstein to continue the experiment with humans.
睇緊時諗起 The Prestige 頂尖對決 個科學家 之後google下 原來真係
睇完覺得其實 The Prestige係影射緊Tesla 同 Edison
不過科學上既成就完全無得比
睇緊時諗起 The Prestige 頂尖對決 個科學家 之後google下 原來真係
睇完覺得其實 The Prestige係影射緊Tesla 同 Edison
不過科學上既成就完全無得比
唔係影射喎
講到明係Tesla喎
主角係聽人講上山揾Tesla
睇緊時諗起 The Prestige 頂尖對決 個科學家 之後google下 原來真係
睇完覺得其實 The Prestige係影射緊Tesla 同 Edison
不過科學上既成就完全無得比
唔係影射喎
講到明係Tesla喎
主角係聽人講上山揾Tesla
新會員你好
陳姑娘叫你打針啊
講起整原子彈都可能關Tesla事，我建議大家睇一本艾西莫夫既科幻小說——《The End of Eternity》
個故事主題係時光管理局帶來既問題，同埋最後間局點樣收皮，當中就關發明原子彈事
（點樣關事？睇過你就知）
可以寫書評去 與言
http://hkgalden.com/view/125044
個故事主題亦可以話係係表達「維穩導致滅亡」![[bomb]](/face/hkg/bomb.gif)
香港獨立
天滅中共
睇緊時諗起 The Prestige 頂尖對決 個科學家 之後google下 原來真係
睇完覺得其實 The Prestige係影射緊Tesla 同 Edison
不過科學上既成就完全無得比
唔係影射喎
講到明係Tesla喎
主角係聽人講上山揾Tesla
套戲唔錯, 不過 Tesla 部機可以咁玩既咩
留名
lm
| 上一頁 |
| 發表 |