時事臺
發表文章發起投票
上一頁下一頁
美軍宣佈 成功將海水轉化為液體燃料
美國海軍研究實驗室
用海水轉化合成液體燃料 試驗推動模式飛機 :


https://youtube.com/watch?v=Iavz7AnKI8I

Navy researchers at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL), Materials Science and Technology Division, demonstrate proof-of-concept of novel NRL technologies developed for the recovery of carbon dioxide (CO2) and hydrogen (H2) from seawater and conversion to a liquid hydrocarbon fuel.

海水變液體燃料, 將成為美國海軍里程碑.

An RC Plane That Flies On Seawater Fuel
Andrew Liszewski 8 April 2014 4:30 PM

It’s been almost a year and a half since we first reported on the US Navy’s plans to produce cheap liquid fuel from seawater. And, as a proof of concept, the unmodified two-stroke engine in this P-51 Mustang remote control model plane was recently powered using the new liquid fuel instead of traditional petrol.

The new type of fuel — known as a liquid hydrocarbon — is created by extracting both carbon dioxide and hydrogen from regular old seawater, and then recombining them using a proprietary gas-to-liquid process.


But why use dirty seawater instead of the crystal clear H2O you can get in a bottle? It turns out that the concentration of CO2 in the earth’s oceans is about 140 times greater than it is in the air. So it’s easier and cheaper to extract using machinery no larger than a compact car. Which means that one day the US Navy’s entire fleet could have a nearly endless supply of fuel as long as the planet’s oceans didn’t dry up.
http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2014/04/an-rc-plane-that-flies-on-seawater-fuel/

美國海軍研究實驗室:
Scale Model WWII Craft Takes Flight With Fuel From the Sea Concept
http://www.nrl.navy.mil/media/news-releases/2014/scale-model-wwii-craft-takes-flight-with-fuel-from-the-sea-concept
#oh# :P #good#

Good 16Bad 0
15/04/14 4:05 PM
引用快速引用

本貼文共有 62 個回覆
此貼文已鎖,將不接受回覆
咩原理? 92% efficiency即係話都係有energy loss喎
#2615/04/14 4:38 PM
引用快速引用
咁你玩晒啦
#2715/04/14 4:47 PM
引用快速引用
咩原理? 92% efficiency即係話都係有energy loss喎

冇燃料係冇energy loss呀?
#2815/04/14 4:50 PM
引用快速引用
用得係船就用得係車
石油時代過去

唔通美帝自己毀滅美元-石油經濟?

你地玩金錢戰爭時佢都上左其他星球[sosad]

除非美元搵其他更攏斷嘅嘢做back up

#2915/04/14 4:52 PM
引用快速引用
#adore#
#3015/04/14 4:56 PM
引用快速引用
用得係船就用得係車
石油時代過去

唔通美帝自己毀滅美元-石油經濟?

你地玩金錢戰爭時佢都上左其他星球[sosad]

除非美元搵其他更攏斷嘅嘢做back up

攏斷其他星球嘅資源囉[banghead]
#3115/04/14 4:57 PM
引用快速引用
用得係船就用得係車
石油時代過去

唔通美帝自己毀滅美元-石油經濟?

你地玩金錢戰爭時佢都上左其他星球[sosad]

除非美元搵其他更攏斷嘅嘢做back up

攏斷其他星球嘅資源囉[banghead]

氦三?
#3215/04/14 4:59 PM
引用快速引用
咁你玩晒啦

美軍:係 !! 就係我玩哂 !! 點?[slick]
[369] [369] [369]
#3315/04/14 5:00 PM
引用快速引用
幾時先普及
#3415/04/14 5:00 PM
引用快速引用
咩原理? 92% efficiency即係話都係有energy loss喎

冇燃料係冇energy loss呀?

92% efficiency 已經好勁啦, 如果成功用到落而家D飛機度, 咁同D戰機用核動力無咩分別. 補給簡單好多
#3515/04/14 5:06 PM
引用快速引用
幾時先普及

美國可能自己用, 其他國家慢慢諗點轉啦
#3615/04/14 5:07 PM
引用快速引用
會唔會改變海水水質?
生態災難#bye#
#3715/04/14 5:10 PM
引用快速引用
神仙快d入黎打丁#yup#
#3815/04/14 5:10 PM
引用快速引用
美帝講得出黎,應該可以實戰用[bomb] [bomb] [bomb]

#3915/04/14 5:12 PM
引用快速引用
咩原理? 92% efficiency即係話都係有energy loss喎

冇燃料係冇energy loss呀?

92% efficiency 已經好勁啦, 如果成功用到落而家D飛機度, 咁同D戰機用核動力無咩分別. 補給簡單好多


美帝 : 其實堆飛機已經用緊空氣發電,補給都唔駛喇 [slick]
#4015/04/14 5:16 PM
引用快速引用
我第一時間唸,支那知道d海水咁有用,遲下海水都被抽乾[sosad]
#4115/04/14 5:19 PM
引用快速引用
Cost?
#4215/04/14 6:47 PM
引用快速引用
Cost?

[banghead] 原來有
#4315/04/14 6:49 PM
引用快速引用
中國宣佈 成功將精液轉化為液體燃料


都好撚勁架喎
中國佬咁鍾意打飛機[banghead]
#4415/04/14 6:50 PM
引用快速引用
中國宣佈 成功將精液轉化為液體燃料

不是日本嗎???
#4515/04/14 7:01 PM
引用快速引用
其實真定假?
提煉CO2既能量又點黎?
#4615/04/14 7:11 PM
引用快速引用
核融合發電
#4715/04/14 7:13 PM
引用快速引用
支蠻死穴, 共匪最怕就係外國勢力, 李柱銘同陳方安生一去美加, 班柒頭有得震冇得瞓
呀 "爺" 最怕美高祖 (呀 "爺" 個呀爺)
#4815/04/14 7:56 PM
引用快速引用
#adore# #adore# #adore#

#4915/04/14 8:02 PM
引用快速引用
其實真定假?
提煉CO2既能量又點黎?

大不了整隻核能補給船 或者核動力航母入面造埋提煉

個目的並唔係搵新能源/免費能源, 而係 能源<->燃料 形態轉化.
唔使改裝船/飛機 就可以用呢個方式補給.
能源源頭其實唔難, 美佬玩核能航母都咁多年, 幾十年唔使換燃料棒, 根本用之不盡. 只係上唔到普通船/飛機/甚至陸戰戰車...
有左呢種轉化方法, 就可以源源不絕補給. 燃油無中生有
(據講係可以合成飛機用燃料, 咁連航母戰機補給都解決埋 )
#5015/04/14 8:49 PM
引用快速引用
秒後自動載入第 3
上一頁下一頁
發表
請先登入以發表回覆