| 發表文章 | 發起投票 |
| 上一頁 |
美軍宣佈 成功將海水轉化為液體燃料
美國海軍研究實驗室
用海水轉化合成液體燃料 試驗推動模式飛機 :
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Iavz7AnKI8I
Navy researchers at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL), Materials Science and Technology Division, demonstrate proof-of-concept of novel NRL technologies developed for the recovery of carbon dioxide (CO2) and hydrogen (H2) from seawater and conversion to a liquid hydrocarbon fuel.
海水變液體燃料, 將成為美國海軍里程碑.
An RC Plane That Flies On Seawater Fuel
Andrew Liszewski 8 April 2014 4:30 PM
It’s been almost a year and a half since we first reported on the US Navy’s plans to produce cheap liquid fuel from seawater. And, as a proof of concept, the unmodified two-stroke engine in this P-51 Mustang remote control model plane was recently powered using the new liquid fuel instead of traditional petrol.
The new type of fuel — known as a liquid hydrocarbon — is created by extracting both carbon dioxide and hydrogen from regular old seawater, and then recombining them using a proprietary gas-to-liquid process.
But why use dirty seawater instead of the crystal clear H2O you can get in a bottle? It turns out that the concentration of CO2 in the earth’s oceans is about 140 times greater than it is in the air. So it’s easier and cheaper to extract using machinery no larger than a compact car. Which means that one day the US Navy’s entire fleet could have a nearly endless supply of fuel as long as the planet’s oceans didn’t dry up.
http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2014/04/an-rc-plane-that-flies-on-seawater-fuel/
美國海軍研究實驗室:
Scale Model WWII Craft Takes Flight With Fuel From the Sea Concept
http://www.nrl.navy.mil/media/news-releases/2014/scale-model-wwii-craft-takes-flight-with-fuel-from-the-sea-concept
用海水轉化合成液體燃料 試驗推動模式飛機 :
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Iavz7AnKI8I
Navy researchers at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL), Materials Science and Technology Division, demonstrate proof-of-concept of novel NRL technologies developed for the recovery of carbon dioxide (CO2) and hydrogen (H2) from seawater and conversion to a liquid hydrocarbon fuel.
海水變液體燃料, 將成為美國海軍里程碑.
An RC Plane That Flies On Seawater Fuel
Andrew Liszewski 8 April 2014 4:30 PM
It’s been almost a year and a half since we first reported on the US Navy’s plans to produce cheap liquid fuel from seawater. And, as a proof of concept, the unmodified two-stroke engine in this P-51 Mustang remote control model plane was recently powered using the new liquid fuel instead of traditional petrol.
The new type of fuel — known as a liquid hydrocarbon — is created by extracting both carbon dioxide and hydrogen from regular old seawater, and then recombining them using a proprietary gas-to-liquid process.
But why use dirty seawater instead of the crystal clear H2O you can get in a bottle? It turns out that the concentration of CO2 in the earth’s oceans is about 140 times greater than it is in the air. So it’s easier and cheaper to extract using machinery no larger than a compact car. Which means that one day the US Navy’s entire fleet could have a nearly endless supply of fuel as long as the planet’s oceans didn’t dry up.
http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2014/04/an-rc-plane-that-flies-on-seawater-fuel/
美國海軍研究實驗室:
Scale Model WWII Craft Takes Flight With Fuel From the Sea Concept
http://www.nrl.navy.mil/media/news-releases/2014/scale-model-wwii-craft-takes-flight-with-fuel-from-the-sea-concept
本貼文共有 62 個回覆
此貼文已鎖，將不接受回覆
Cost?原來有
就算 cost 高 d 都有用.
要計埋慳返o既補給艦運輸成本, 越遠越大鑊! 同埋效率低. 係咁運來運去.
仲有消耗勁多燃油, 咁到底係邊個據點注入補給船? 變成部署唔靈活、政治、軍事問題.
美軍唔係冇能源 (例如核能), 只係個能源冇辦法轉去普通船/飛機/車 上面用. 要全部硬件改裝(例如用電) 技術上未必得 (唔夠力、未成熟、成本重、甚至冇可能.. 例如戰機), 但如果好似呢個研究咁"兼容", 咁 能量->合成燃料->補給 就解決哂所有傳統戰機軍艦戰車... o既補給. 成本再高都值得.
搵母艦個反應爐高溫分解水做氫氣未得囉
![[yipes]](/face/hkg/yipes.gif)
Cost?
就算 cost 高 d 都有用.
要計埋慳返o既補給艦運輸成本, 越遠越大鑊! 同埋效率低. 係咁運來運去.
仲有消耗勁多燃油, 咁到底係邊個據點注入補給船? 變成部署唔靈活、政治、軍事問題.
美軍唔係冇能源 (例如核能), 只係個能源冇辦法轉去普通船/飛機/車 上面用. 要全部硬件改裝(例如用電) 技術上未必得 (唔夠力、未成熟、成本重、甚至冇可能.. 例如戰機), 但如果好似呢個研究咁"兼容", 咁 能量->合成燃料->補給 就解決哂所有傳統戰機軍艦戰車... o既補給. 成本再高都值得.
統戰全球未是夢
搵母艦個反應爐高溫分解水做氫氣未得囉
氫氣唔穩定，難處理
![[bomb]](/face/hkg/bomb.gif)
幾時整到太陽爐
![[shocking]](/face/hkg/shocking.gif)
Cost?
就算 cost 高 d 都有用.
要計埋慳返o既補給艦運輸成本, 越遠越大鑊! 同埋效率低. 係咁運來運去.
仲有消耗勁多燃油, 咁到底係邊個據點注入補給船? 變成部署唔靈活、政治、軍事問題.
美軍唔係冇能源 (例如核能), 只係個能源冇辦法轉去普通船/飛機/車 上面用. 要全部硬件改裝(例如用電) 技術上未必得 (唔夠力、未成熟、成本重、甚至冇可能.. 例如戰機), 但如果好似呢個研究咁"兼容", 咁 能量->合成燃料->補給 就解決哂所有傳統戰機軍艦戰車... o既補給. 成本再高都值得.
統戰全球未是夢
佢個技術真係好過個 d 電能車萬陪，咁講遲 d ，日本一定試起核廠，用核能將海水變電油。
美帝遲啲係空氣中直接抽二氧化碳，二氧化碳唔夠，全球農作物大失收。
美帝跟手賣基因改造『抗低二氧化碳』種子，賺多筆。![:-]](/face/hkg/devil.gif)
美帝跟手賣基因改造『抗低二氧化碳』種子，賺多筆。
美帝遲啲係空氣中直接抽二氧化碳，二氧化碳唔夠，全球農作物大失收。
美帝跟手賣基因改造『抗低二氧化碳』種子，賺多筆。
why use dirty seawater instead of the crystal clear H2O you can get in a bottle? It turns out that the concentration of CO2 in the earth’s oceans is about 140 times greater than it is in the air.
美佬一早諗過啦
海水o既 co2 含量 係空氣 140倍
所以唔會用空氣.唔係唔想用空氣... 只係海水更有效率
| 上一頁 |
| 發表 |