[Do it] 終於到啦！！！ - 香港膠登 HKGalden

雷超用咩相機袋？

我用緊送嘅薄袋，但買咗touit唔夠放
一直想買個斜咩袋，兼可以放相機又可以平時用
背包就睇下sony個款夠唔夠放touit咁粗嘅鏡

其實有冇好介紹

我一個斜咩一個背狼

#12715/07/14 8:19 PM

引用快速引用

雷超都快d轉會啦

你轉左ff?

咁快手?

冇錢轉
A7好貴, FF鏡更貴

單反其實有唔少平鏡，無反又少又貴

睇下有無Mount / adaptor je

邊有分咩機咩機
除非部機個咀太細入唔到粗鏡

有d日本仔以前自己改Mount，單鏡機用Leica M鏡都係咁
大機細鏡好樣衰咁解

上面張相放大100%先睇到精髓

A7加adapter=無撚敵
二維用緊咩ff鏡？

你估下

#12815/07/14 8:20 PM

引用快速引用

大王Zeiss鏡用咩filter好？
用sony zeiss protector定係副廠都得

zeiss鏡本身都有t* coating，使唔使再另加t* protector?

贊助網站

#12915/07/14 9:06 PM

引用快速引用

大王Zeiss鏡用咩filter好？
用sony zeiss protector定係副廠都得

zeiss鏡本身都有t* coating，使唔使再另加t* protector?

用B+W同Hoya，成像真係有影響，B+W好d，要用就唔好慳啦，我除左要用nd/cpl之外都係一直裝住

#13015/07/14 10:45 PM

引用快速引用

雷超用咩相機袋？

我用緊送嘅薄袋，但買咗touit唔夠放
一直想買個斜咩袋，兼可以放相機又可以平時用
背包就睇下sony個款夠唔夠放touit咁粗嘅鏡

其實有冇好介紹

我一個斜咩一個背狼

實用無咩樣
Delsey or Tenba

要樣又想有D實用
National Geographic

要樣多於實用
Billingham

利申: 用緊Delsey, 以前用Tenba

#13115/07/14 11:39 PM

引用快速引用

大王Zeiss鏡用咩filter好？
用sony zeiss protector定係副廠都得

zeiss鏡本身都有t* coating，使唔使再另加t* protector?

用B+W同Hoya，成像真係有影響，B+W好d，要用就唔好慳啦，我除左要用nd/cpl之外都係一直裝住

建議B+W
不過如果唔係追極限
就唔駛買咁貴
因為分別唔太大
其實hoya都ok

利申: 有B+W, 都有leica, 同Zeiss, 同埋hoya filter [banghead]

#13215/07/14 11:45 PM

引用快速引用

雷超用咩相機袋？

我用緊送嘅薄袋，但買咗touit唔夠放
一直想買個斜咩袋，兼可以放相機又可以平時用
背包就睇下sony個款夠唔夠放touit咁粗嘅鏡

其實有冇好介紹

我一個斜咩一個背狼

實用無咩樣
Delsey or Tenba

要樣又想有D實用
National Geographic

要樣多於實用
Billingham

利申: 用緊Delsey, 以前用Tenba

Billingham=

懶係扮到唔似相機袋咁其實整到咁漲一d都唔match個款，仲要d啊叔全部襯polo+牛仔褲撞到嘭嘭聲
沒有最柒只有更柒

#13316/07/14 12:00 AM

引用快速引用

大王Zeiss鏡用咩filter好？
用sony zeiss protector定係副廠都得

zeiss鏡本身都有t* coating，使唔使再另加t* protector?

用B+W同Hoya，成像真係有影響，B+W好d，要用就唔好慳啦，我除左要用nd/cpl之外都係一直裝住

建議B+W
不過如果唔係追極限
就唔駛買咁貴
因為分別唔太大
其實hoya都ok

利申: 有B+W, 都有leica, 同Zeiss, 同埋hoya filter

貴過我支鏡

#13416/07/14 12:02 AM

引用快速引用

大王Zeiss鏡用咩filter好？
用sony zeiss protector定係副廠都得

zeiss鏡本身都有t* coating，使唔使再另加t* protector?

用B+W同Hoya，成像真係有影響，B+W好d，要用就唔好慳啦，我除左要用nd/cpl之外都係一直裝住

建議B+W
不過如果唔係追極限
就唔駛買咁貴
因為分別唔太大
其實hoya都ok

利申: 有B+W, 都有leica, 同Zeiss, 同埋hoya filter

貴過我支鏡

Leica O個個HKD$400 39mm UV
Zeiss O個個係skylight B50 ....無記錯都係HKD$400
反而B+W O個個39mm Käsemann-type CPL 39mm 最貴 [banghead]

.......4位數...頭

#13516/07/14 12:21 AM

引用快速引用

大王Zeiss鏡用咩filter好？
用sony zeiss protector定係副廠都得

zeiss鏡本身都有t* coating，使唔使再另加t* protector?

用B+W同Hoya，成像真係有影響，B+W好d，要用就唔好慳啦，我除左要用nd/cpl之外都係一直裝住

建議B+W
不過如果唔係追極限
就唔駛買咁貴
因為分別唔太大
其實hoya都ok

利申: 有B+W, 都有leica, 同Zeiss, 同埋hoya filter

貴過我支鏡

Leica O個個HKD$400 39mm UV
Zeiss O個個係skylight B50 ....無記錯都係HKD$400
反而B+W O個個39mm Käsemann-type CPL 39mm 最貴 .......4位數...頭

#13616/07/14 12:25 AM

引用快速引用

大王Zeiss鏡用咩filter好？
用sony zeiss protector定係副廠都得

zeiss鏡本身都有t* coating，使唔使再另加t* protector?

用B+W同Hoya，成像真係有影響，B+W好d，要用就唔好慳啦，我除左要用nd/cpl之外都係一直裝住

建議B+W
不過如果唔係追極限
就唔駛買咁貴
因為分別唔太大
其實hoya都ok

利申: 有B+W, 都有leica, 同Zeiss, 同埋hoya filter

貴過我支鏡

Leica O個個HKD$400 39mm UV
Zeiss O個個係skylight B50 ....無記錯都係HKD$400
反而B+W O個個39mm Käsemann-type CPL 39mm 最貴 .......4位數...頭

http://www.sony.com.hk/products/apps/product/simplePage.do?modelCode=02633591&lang=zh
買呢個好唔好?

#13716/07/14 10:02 AM

引用快速引用

大王Zeiss鏡用咩filter好？
用sony zeiss protector定係副廠都得

zeiss鏡本身都有t* coating，使唔使再另加t* protector?

用B+W同Hoya，成像真係有影響，B+W好d，要用就唔好慳啦，我除左要用nd/cpl之外都係一直裝住

建議B+W
不過如果唔係追極限
就唔駛買咁貴
因為分別唔太大
其實hoya都ok

利申: 有B+W, 都有leica, 同Zeiss, 同埋hoya filter

貴過我支鏡

Leica O個個HKD$400 39mm UV
Zeiss O個個係skylight B50 ....無記錯都係HKD$400
反而B+W O個個39mm Käsemann-type CPL 39mm 最貴 .......4位數...頭

http://www.sony.com.hk/products/apps/product/simplePage.do?modelCode=02633591&lang=zh
買呢個好唔好?

好似同B+W差唔多價
(因為我有會員85折)

#13816/07/14 10:04 AM

引用快速引用

Moe

Filter 除左多個保護仲有乜用 ?_?

贊助網站

#13916/07/14 10:32 AM

引用快速引用

大王Zeiss鏡用咩filter好？
用sony zeiss protector定係副廠都得

zeiss鏡本身都有t* coating，使唔使再另加t* protector?

用B+W同Hoya，成像真係有影響，B+W好d，要用就唔好慳啦，我除左要用nd/cpl之外都係一直裝住

建議B+W
不過如果唔係追極限
就唔駛買咁貴
因為分別唔太大
其實hoya都ok

利申: 有B+W, 都有leica, 同Zeiss, 同埋hoya filter

貴過我支鏡

Leica O個個HKD$400 39mm UV
Zeiss O個個係skylight B50 ....無記錯都係HKD$400
反而B+W O個個39mm Käsemann-type CPL 39mm 最貴 .......4位數...頭

http://www.sony.com.hk/products/apps/product/simplePage.do?modelCode=02633591&lang=zh
買呢個好唔好?

好似同B+W差唔多價
(因為我有會員85折)

會員

#14016/07/14 10:42 AM

引用快速引用

Filter 除左多個保護仲有乜用

保護鏡就係保護, 但唔想影響質素, 所以問下邊款好

其他filter有CPL, ND
ND係減光鏡, 就係用來減光, 可以用喺陽光充沛環境, 減光而運用長曝拍攝流水等效果
CPL可以減反光(filter out polarized light), 如水面反光, 經計算, 與水面成45度角可以隔最多
同時因為吸走偏振光線, 亦會減低亮度, 故可同時當減光鏡使用(理論上最多應該減少一半intensity)

利申: 識Physics鳩up

#14116/07/14 11:11 AM

引用快速引用

大王Zeiss鏡用咩filter好？
用sony zeiss protector定係副廠都得

zeiss鏡本身都有t* coating，使唔使再另加t* protector?

用B+W同Hoya，成像真係有影響，B+W好d，要用就唔好慳啦，我除左要用nd/cpl之外都係一直裝住

建議B+W
不過如果唔係追極限
就唔駛買咁貴
因為分別唔太大
其實hoya都ok

利申: 有B+W, 都有leica, 同Zeiss, 同埋hoya filter

貴過我支鏡

Leica O個個HKD$400 39mm UV
Zeiss O個個係skylight B50 ....無記錯都係HKD$400
反而B+W O個個39mm Käsemann-type CPL 39mm 最貴 .......4位數...頭

http://www.sony.com.hk/products/apps/product/simplePage.do?modelCode=02633591&lang=zh
買呢個好唔好?

好似同B+W差唔多價
(因為我有會員85折)

會員

喺佢度買過嘢或買sony嘢就可以登記 [banghead]

唔係咩勁嘢

#14216/07/14 11:12 AM

引用快速引用

Filter 除左多個保護仲有乜用

保護鏡就係保護, 但唔想影響質素, 所以問下邊款好

其他filter有CPL, ND
ND係減光鏡, 就係用來減光, 可以用喺陽光充沛環境, 減光而運用長曝拍攝流水等效果
CPL可以減反光(filter out polarized light), 如水面反光, 經計算, 與水面成45度角可以隔最多
同時因為吸走偏振光線, 亦會減低亮度, 故可同時當減光鏡使用(理論上最多應該減少一半intensity)

利申: 識Physics鳩up

留名學野

#14316/07/14 11:13 AM

引用快速引用

Filter 除左多個保護仲有乜用

唔同filter唔同功能

有D要加左filter先做到.

#14416/07/14 11:42 AM

引用快速引用

http://www.sony.com.hk/products/apps/product/simplePage.do?modelCode=02633591&lang=zh
買呢個好唔好?

(轉貼人地個test)

UV or Not to UV?
Upside: The fact is, today most DSLR sensors aren’t affected by UV rays, and so the filter’s primary role is as a protective filter. Back in the days of film cameras, UV protection was needed, but we’ve come a long way since then. For a DSLR a UV filter and a protector filter are the same thing. Much like our smartphones have protective cases, we want our camera lenses to be protected and the UV filter is just the ticket for doing so. It protects the lens against kids’ greasy little hands that love to touch things. Dogs nose prints. And, for those who live in places where the elements of sand, sea salt, and dirt are an issue, it’s a protective layer against Mother Nature.

From some photographers’ standpoint, the UV filter takes away from lens flare and unwanted reflections (though not to the same level as a polarizer). Others are clumsy and even with their camera strap have the tendency to drop things or accidently bump their cameras into things that might scratch the lens. It lessens the need to use a lens cap consistently during a shoot. And, of course, it’s easier and less worrying to clean the filter than the camera lens.

Downside: When you use a filter, UV, polarizer or any other filter a new optical layer is added where light can be reflected and refracted. If you’re out shooting at night or if you are shooting from in front of your light source, the filter can cause unwanted flares, which reduces the quality of your shot. This holds true for any filter, not only UV filters.

There is the possibility that the UV filter will also cut down on sharpness. This might be something you want to experiment with. Try taking a particular shot with and without your UV filter and see if it makes a difference. If so, that’s a consideration. If the elements, like sand, dirt, salt, aren’t an issue – like if you’re in a park doing a portrait shoot – then it may be worth removing the filter.

#14516/07/14 11:50 AM

引用快速引用

Filter 除左多個保護仲有乜用

保護鏡就係保護, 但唔想影響質素, 所以問下邊款好

其他filter有CPL, ND
ND係減光鏡, 就係用來減光, 可以用喺陽光充沛環境, 減光而運用長曝拍攝流水等效果
CPL可以減反光(filter out polarized light), 如水面反光, 經計算, 與水面成45度角可以隔最多
同時因為吸走偏振光線, 亦會減低亮度, 故可同時當減光鏡使用(理論上最多應該減少一半intensity)

利申: 識Physics鳩up

留名學physics

只有影響最少, 唔會無影響......要最低影響唯有買最高質素, 要影得最好就唔好用filter

#14616/07/14 11:53 AM

引用快速引用