| 發表文章 | 發起投票 |
| 上一頁 | 下一頁 |
又到爆料&討論時間(31)
本貼文共有 1001 個回覆
此貼文已鎖,將不接受回覆
![]()
唔係咁嘅意思, 只係怕佢哋亂開槍,亂咁打人(連細路同婦孺都唔放過)啫!![]()
咁一定啦!佢地要製造混亂![]()
請大家細心聽聽佢嘅分析,係暫時我聽嘅分析裏面最到位的
[url] http://memehk.com/index.php?page=program&id=1 [/url]
![]()
唔係咁嘅意思, 只係怕佢哋亂開槍,亂咁打人(連細路同婦孺都唔放過)啫!![]()
咁一定啦!佢地要製造混亂![]()
請大家細心聽聽佢嘅分析,係暫時我聽嘅分析裏面最到位的![]()
[url] http://memehk.com/index.php?page=program&id=1 [/url]
![]()
唔係咁嘅意思, 只係怕佢哋亂開槍,亂咁打人(連細路同婦孺都唔放過)啫!![]()
咁一定啦!佢地要製造混亂![]()
請大家細心聽聽佢嘅分析,係暫時我聽嘅分析裏面最到位的![]()
[url] http://memehk.com/index.php?page=program&id=1 [/url]
![]()
唔係咁嘅意思, 只係怕佢哋亂開槍,亂咁打人(連細路同婦孺都唔放過)啫!![]()
咁一定啦!佢地要製造混亂![]()
請大家細心聽聽佢嘅分析,係暫時我聽嘅分析裏面最到位的![]()
[url] http://memehk.com/index.php?page=program&id=1 [/url]
老蕭講曬出黎啦!D港豬醒未呀
支那![]()
![]()
![]()
http://hkm.appledaily.com/detail.php?guid=52857899&category_guid=10793140&category=instant&issue=20140902
,
agree
中共擺明話反對,證明左有野隱瞞左祖國
學太極抗共好過學出面功夫
當然要搵到好師父
共軍太豬兜,但體格堅捱得
拳頭夠重夠狠,我幾年前冇做走狗冇耐個陣同一件打過,諗住自己話晒做過走狗又百六磅實唔衰得去邊,最後咁係慘敗
而家學左幾年太極,識左以柔制剛同借力打力,而家我做底一件共狗冇問題
但好似我咁既人香港係極少,香港後生仔太嘆慣,又太冇耐力,第日如果共狗發難,真係做沙包都冇資格
講堅,學太極+泰拳,學習時間較短但效果大,多食豆類少食紅肉,大力細力同肥瘦冇關係,太極可以保護自己同時可以強身健體
雖然一切計劃行事,但中間你保證唔到走狗既走狗為左上位突然搞事
上個post:http://hkgalden.com/view/181368/page/31
#771儲糧難儲咪去降低自己對糧食既需求,咁咪變相可以儲咁多既量
我既年紀同身材正常一日要2500卡路里同2.5L水,但我訓練到只需1500卡路里同1.25L水
要 train 唔難
但負重力較差,上盤唔 strong
食多D豆類食物同練太極
亞洲人天生體質問題,用傳統方法練負重好多時會搞到血管硬化,但練太極就唔會,仲可以練到九成傳統方法既效果
我而家抱起一個百五磅既人再過頭撻佢係冇問題 (我得 110磅)
邊句先係真![]()
再追前D,再前D我有講儲糧儲唔夠就降低自身對糧食既需求,我幾年前百五六磅時需要2500卡,而家經訓練後110磅只需1500卡路里
野道士正正表現出香港新一代既理解力偏低同思維模式過窄,所以我成日叫大家要自強先可以同共狗玩
原來唔使追前都得
我幾年前冇做走狗冇耐個陣同一件打過,諗住自己話晒做過走狗又百六磅實唔衰得去邊
我而家抱起一個百五磅既人再過頭撻佢係冇問題 (我得 110磅)
你紅字放大既兩句野已經講明我幾年前百六磅同而家110磅
咁都睇唔到,難怪'香港獨立'暗串今時今日仲有人要問邊個信得過
太極拳真是博大精深
難怪雜種很有信心跟班馬討價還價幫手打外星人了。
[/quote]
[/quote]
語帶雙關![]()
蛀米大蟲BB 一鍵留名!
又有人搞死左個版面
熱狗可能有鬼
新來,大家好,追左個幾月先追到live
Ukraine crisis: Nato readies a rapid-reaction spearhead force in response to Russian intervention - with sizeable British contingent
Nato is to form a 4,000-strong spearhead force designed to go into action in 48 hours in response to Russian intervention in Ukraine. Stockpiles of military equipment will be stored at bases in Eastern Europe for the troops to use when they go into operation.
The mission, which is expected to have a sizeable British contingent, is due to be unveiled at the Nato summit in Wales later this week. It will include special forces, air, naval and intelligence detachments which will deploy alongside the soldiers of the host nation against an outside threat.
The Alliance has not named Russia as the threat against whom the measures are being taken and has stressed that it can be deployed anywhere in the world. But it will be working alongside the Readiness Action Plan which will have bases, it is believed, in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Romania.
The deployment is certain to be seen as provocative by the Kremlin. Under the 1997 Founding Act, which was viewed as ending the Cold War, Nato pledged to Boris Yeltsin’s government that it would not have a permanent troop presence in any of the former Warsaw Pact states. Nato insists that the bases do not break the pact as they are not permanent, but they will be there “for as long as it takes”. A senior official stated: “We have been through this thoroughly, taken extensive legal advice, and this is not in breach of the Act. There will not be permanent presence in these bases, there will not, for example, be personnel stationed there with their families.”
The force is part of a raft of measures being taken by Nato to sharpen up its reaction since the Ukraine crisis began in February. Since then, Crimea has been annexed by Vladimir Putin’s government and separatist forces, with Russian backing, are engaged in an increasingly violent civil war in the east of the country.
nders Fogh Rasmussen, the Nato Secretary-General, said on Monday: “This is a time of multiple crises on several fronts. To the east, Russia is intervening overtly in Ukraine; to the south we see growing instability, with fragile states, the rise [of] extremism, and sectarian strife. These crises can erupt with little warning, move at great speed and they all affect our security in different ways.
READ MORE: WHY DO WE STAND BY AND WATCH PUTIN?
NATO IS AT A CROSSROADS
“We will develop a spearhead within our response force. This will require reception facilities in Nato territory, pre-positioned equipment and supplies, command and control and logistics experts. So this force can travel light, but strike hard if needed.
“…That also means more visible Nato presence in the east for as long as required, not because Nato wants to attack anyone, but because the dangers and the threats are more present and more visible and we’ll do what it takes to defend our allies.”
Poland, the Baltic States and Canada are calling for the repeal of the Founding Act, according to diplomatic sources, after accusing the Russians of sending regular troops, tanks and artillery into Ukraine. Kiev’s forces, after a series of successes in recent months, are now on the defensive, with separatist forces making gains in the south-east and seeking to force a corridor to Crimea.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/ukraine-crisis-nato-readies-a-rapidreaction-spearhead-force-in-response-to-russian-intervention--with-sizeable-british-contingent-9704984.html
要出手了
Nato is to form a 4,000-strong spearhead force designed to go into action in 48 hours in response to Russian intervention in Ukraine. Stockpiles of military equipment will be stored at bases in Eastern Europe for the troops to use when they go into operation.
The mission, which is expected to have a sizeable British contingent, is due to be unveiled at the Nato summit in Wales later this week. It will include special forces, air, naval and intelligence detachments which will deploy alongside the soldiers of the host nation against an outside threat.
The Alliance has not named Russia as the threat against whom the measures are being taken and has stressed that it can be deployed anywhere in the world. But it will be working alongside the Readiness Action Plan which will have bases, it is believed, in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Romania.
The deployment is certain to be seen as provocative by the Kremlin. Under the 1997 Founding Act, which was viewed as ending the Cold War, Nato pledged to Boris Yeltsin’s government that it would not have a permanent troop presence in any of the former Warsaw Pact states. Nato insists that the bases do not break the pact as they are not permanent, but they will be there “for as long as it takes”. A senior official stated: “We have been through this thoroughly, taken extensive legal advice, and this is not in breach of the Act. There will not be permanent presence in these bases, there will not, for example, be personnel stationed there with their families.”
The force is part of a raft of measures being taken by Nato to sharpen up its reaction since the Ukraine crisis began in February. Since then, Crimea has been annexed by Vladimir Putin’s government and separatist forces, with Russian backing, are engaged in an increasingly violent civil war in the east of the country.
nders Fogh Rasmussen, the Nato Secretary-General, said on Monday: “This is a time of multiple crises on several fronts. To the east, Russia is intervening overtly in Ukraine; to the south we see growing instability, with fragile states, the rise [of] extremism, and sectarian strife. These crises can erupt with little warning, move at great speed and they all affect our security in different ways.
READ MORE: WHY DO WE STAND BY AND WATCH PUTIN?
NATO IS AT A CROSSROADS
“We will develop a spearhead within our response force. This will require reception facilities in Nato territory, pre-positioned equipment and supplies, command and control and logistics experts. So this force can travel light, but strike hard if needed.
“…That also means more visible Nato presence in the east for as long as required, not because Nato wants to attack anyone, but because the dangers and the threats are more present and more visible and we’ll do what it takes to defend our allies.”
Poland, the Baltic States and Canada are calling for the repeal of the Founding Act, according to diplomatic sources, after accusing the Russians of sending regular troops, tanks and artillery into Ukraine. Kiev’s forces, after a series of successes in recent months, are now on the defensive, with separatist forces making gains in the south-east and seeking to force a corridor to Crimea.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/ukraine-crisis-nato-readies-a-rapidreaction-spearhead-force-in-response-to-russian-intervention--with-sizeable-british-contingent-9704984.html
要出手了
秒後自動載入第 10 頁
| 上一頁 | 下一頁 |
| 發表 |
