| 發表文章 | 發起投票 |
| 上一頁 | 下一頁 |
又到爆料&討論時間(56)
多謝大家繼續支持 
過去網友們很多問題都已經記錄在以下的舊 post 裡, 特別是有關軍工電腦/共濟會/梁賊的過去/滅共/儲糧/cash is king/開松果體/冥想/NWO/BNO/大小 Picture/香港大 Picture 和 美元 都可以在過去的 post 裡找到, 各位新來的巴打可以慢慢邊飲咖啡/朱古力邊閱讀 (爬文), 之後才參與討論以免問題不段重複影響大家討論的氣氛, 謝謝.
如果有記者朋友 or 巴打想借用過去及這裡的內容煩請註明出處, 謝謝.
以下是世界各地的支持者
有一點我要強調, 英國是責任上要幫 bno 香港人, 但美國是沒有責任幫香港人的, 如果任何香港人諗住不用付出就有美國為香港人打生打死, 呢 d 香港人不救也吧! 自己家園都唔主動保護仲要指意一個完全無任何責任的美國去打救, 真係連共匪都睇呢 d 人唔起呀.
會社要消滅共匪可以話係天職, 但消滅共匪唔一定要救香港人, 這是道理. 美國就是睇到很多香港人都不自愛只望著美國打救 (當中仲有唔少是主動出賣香港), 所以遲遲都唔肯主動派兵保護香港雖然香港有幾千億美元的儲備 (儲備放在那裡我 "唔講得").
注意:
a. 所有與我爆料內容無關的文章請開新 post 自行討論；另外也請勿 post 任何5毛的文章，我會視為5毛而封鎖有關網友的。
b. 如果網友的問題與我爆料內容無關的 or 涉及我家人/我個人私隱/想起我底的，我一律不答。
c. 由於我爆料的重點不是傳教為免網友誤會，請不要問我有關基督宗教的睇法 or 解釋聖經內的章節，網友可以自行開新 post 討論。
d. 為了不讓共匪有所準備我是不會透露任何 action 的日期和有關策略/戰略，請網友們不要再問。
e. 所有問我某某是否會員的問題除非有非常充份的理由能夠說服我，否則一律不答。
如果有網友因為以上幾點而不能得到我的答案謹止至歉。
請大家在之前的 post 傾爆後再到這裡繼續討論
過去網友們很多問題都已經記錄在以下的舊 post 裡, 特別是有關軍工電腦/共濟會/梁賊的過去/滅共/儲糧/cash is king/開松果體/冥想/NWO/BNO/大小 Picture/香港大 Picture 和 美元 都可以在過去的 post 裡找到, 各位新來的巴打可以慢慢邊飲咖啡/朱古力邊閱讀 (爬文), 之後才參與討論以免問題不段重複影響大家討論的氣氛, 謝謝.
如果有記者朋友 or 巴打想借用過去及這裡的內容煩請註明出處, 謝謝.
以下是世界各地的支持者
有一點我要強調, 英國是責任上要幫 bno 香港人, 但美國是沒有責任幫香港人的, 如果任何香港人諗住不用付出就有美國為香港人打生打死, 呢 d 香港人不救也吧! 自己家園都唔主動保護仲要指意一個完全無任何責任的美國去打救, 真係連共匪都睇呢 d 人唔起呀.
會社要消滅共匪可以話係天職, 但消滅共匪唔一定要救香港人, 這是道理. 美國就是睇到很多香港人都不自愛只望著美國打救 (當中仲有唔少是主動出賣香港), 所以遲遲都唔肯主動派兵保護香港雖然香港有幾千億美元的儲備 (儲備放在那裡我 "唔講得").
注意:
a. 所有與我爆料內容無關的文章請開新 post 自行討論；另外也請勿 post 任何5毛的文章，我會視為5毛而封鎖有關網友的。
b. 如果網友的問題與我爆料內容無關的 or 涉及我家人/我個人私隱/想起我底的，我一律不答。
c. 由於我爆料的重點不是傳教為免網友誤會，請不要問我有關基督宗教的睇法 or 解釋聖經內的章節，網友可以自行開新 post 討論。
d. 為了不讓共匪有所準備我是不會透露任何 action 的日期和有關策略/戰略，請網友們不要再問。
e. 所有問我某某是否會員的問題除非有非常充份的理由能夠說服我，否則一律不答。
如果有網友因為以上幾點而不能得到我的答案謹止至歉。
請大家在之前的 post 傾爆後再到這裡繼續討論
本貼文共有 1001 個回覆
此貼文已鎖，將不接受回覆
有人激到卓飛好嬲，係fb話再唔道歉就準備要係mj13爆料，究竟係咩事
飛哥算好脾氣都激到佢咁火滾
過數不解釋有人激到卓飛好嬲，係fb話再唔道歉就準備要係mj13爆料，究竟係咩事
飛哥算好脾氣都激到佢咁火滾
由於日元加速貶值及在中國生產的人力成本上升，日本松下公司正將洗衣機等約四十種家電産品，從海外生產線遷回日本靜岡縣袋井市的工廠。其中，在中國生産的直立式洗衣機預計將在袋井工廠生産。微波爐生產將從中國轉移至神戶市的工廠。早前，松下已決定將空調和滾筒式洗衣機遷回滋賀縣草津市生產，並將電磁爐生産從遷回神戶市。回遷亦可能有助改善日本人就業率。
除了松下之外，大金也已將中國代工生産的家用空調部分轉交給滋賀縣的工廠。
Made in Japan
http://www.881903.com/Page/ZH-TW/newsdetail.aspx?ItemId=771039&csid=261_367補番條link
有人激到卓飛好嬲，係fb話再唔道歉就準備要係mj13爆料，究竟係咩事
飛哥算好脾氣都激到佢咁火滾
有人激到卓飛好嬲，係fb話再唔道歉就準備要係mj13爆料，究竟係咩事
飛哥算好脾氣都激到佢咁火滾
你試下讀出黎 / 當歌仔咁唱出黎應該估到。
你試下讀出黎 / 當歌仔咁唱出黎應該估到。
![[photo]](/face/hkg/photo.gif)
你試下讀出黎 / 當歌仔咁唱出黎應該估到。
即係亞月球姐？
有人激到卓飛好嬲，係fb話再唔道歉就準備要係mj13爆料，究竟係咩事
飛哥算好脾氣都激到佢咁火滾
你試下讀出黎 / 當歌仔咁唱出黎應該估到。
即係亞月球姐？
得罪完雲海，又得罪飛哥，真係自斷米路
真係咁都幾賤下
如果設立咗網絡廿三條，係唔係會違反言論自由？
如果topic and discussion係差不多一樣，可吿
港府最快今日會向國務院港澳辦提交民情報告，監警會前委員張達明在電台節目表示，期望報告列出足夠證據，證明一些重要議題，例如外國勢力支持「顏色革命」。
另一位前監警會委員方敏生指，民情報告應全面收集民意，並具備有準則的分析，現時不就報告作評論，但仍有期望。
有指民情報告下午會上載政府網頁，但當局不會召開記者會交代。特首梁振英之前多次聲言有證據證明佔領行動有外國勢力介入，但被多次要求公開證據時，他只稱適當時候會公開。
另一位前監警會委員方敏生指，民情報告應全面收集民意，並具備有準則的分析，現時不就報告作評論，但仍有期望。
有指民情報告下午會上載政府網頁，但當局不會召開記者會交代。特首梁振英之前多次聲言有證據證明佔領行動有外國勢力介入，但被多次要求公開證據時，他只稱適當時候會公開。
印度一對屬「賤民」階級的情侶，不理女方家長的死亡恐嚇結為夫婦，向警方尋求保護卻遭冷待，最後疑遭女方家人劈死。
旁遮普邦霍斯希亞爾普爾的24歲男子拉尼（Sandeep Rani）與鄰家22歲女子庫什布（Khushboo）相戀，他們不理庫什布家人反對，死前三個月私奔結婚。
據拉尼的母親表示，小夫妻知道違抗女方父母之命，生命會受威脅，向法院求助，並獲頒保護令。不過，當夫妻依保護令要求警方保護時，警員拒絕執行。
拉尼和庫什布返回家鄉，持續受死亡恐嚇，不敢回家，只好寄居朋友家中。後來，拉尼冒險帶庫什布返回家中，即遭五名蒙面男子用刀襲擊，拉尼先被劈死，其父護子受重傷，庫什布亦身受重傷，送院後不治。
拉尼的母親表示，其中一名刀手面罩掉下，認出是庫什布父親。
警方正調查事件，否認有過失，稱警方認為保護令沒有必要，又指拉尼夫婦回家前沒有知會他們。
垃圾國家
旁遮普邦霍斯希亞爾普爾的24歲男子拉尼（Sandeep Rani）與鄰家22歲女子庫什布（Khushboo）相戀，他們不理庫什布家人反對，死前三個月私奔結婚。
據拉尼的母親表示，小夫妻知道違抗女方父母之命，生命會受威脅，向法院求助，並獲頒保護令。不過，當夫妻依保護令要求警方保護時，警員拒絕執行。
拉尼和庫什布返回家鄉，持續受死亡恐嚇，不敢回家，只好寄居朋友家中。後來，拉尼冒險帶庫什布返回家中，即遭五名蒙面男子用刀襲擊，拉尼先被劈死，其父護子受重傷，庫什布亦身受重傷，送院後不治。
拉尼的母親表示，其中一名刀手面罩掉下，認出是庫什布父親。
警方正調查事件，否認有過失，稱警方認為保護令沒有必要，又指拉尼夫婦回家前沒有知會他們。
垃圾國家
科學家發現一條飛往火星的最佳軌道
統使用火箭前往火星的飛船需要進入霍夫曼轉移軌道，而新方法的特點在于不需要使用復雜的地火軌道
騰訊科學訊 據國外媒體報道，前往火星的計劃目前只有美國宇航局有能力進行，該機構也正在積極推進載人登陸火星的任務，飛往火星具有較大的難度，主要涉及到如何選擇軌道，因為這關系到火星任務需要攜帶多少補給貨物。如果宇航員需要花500天完成火星任務，就需要帶上足夠的糧食和燃料，那麼是否有更簡便的方法達到相同的目的呢？目前米蘭理工大學的科學家弗朗西斯科與美國宇航局的專家愛德華通過數學計算發現一條前往火星的捷徑，先將探測器部署在類火星軌道上，再通過火星的引力將其減速並成為火星的衛星。
該理論在1990年時用于日本的月球探測器，但如果用于載人探索火星，那麼在時間上就會增加數月，這就使得原本500天左右的任務期會被延長百來天，而我們獲得的則是更加簡單的軌道設計以及更加便宜的探索火星途徑。從某種意義上看，科學家試圖讓火星飛船利用火星的引力拉回，逐漸“漂移”到火星軌道上，而不是使用自身攜帶的助推器讓火星減速。美國宇航局行星科學部的科學家詹姆斯•格林認為這是一個非常有想象力的軌道設計，使人非常感興趣。
彈道式的捕獲能夠讓我們開啟更多的火星任務，向火星派遣許多探測器，甚至在載人登陸火星時也能夠用到。傳統使用火箭前往火星的飛船需要進入霍夫曼轉移軌道，而新方法的特點在于不需要使用復雜的地火軌道，也不需要進行發動機點火減速，這就大大簡化了前往火星的復雜性。但是火星飛船的發射和巡航的成本仍然保持不變。本項研究論文發表在《天體力學和動力天文學》上。
1990年，日本月球探測器就使用了低能量轉移軌道的設計，科學家設計出一種彈道捕獲軌跡，讓缺乏燃料的探測器進入月球軌道，這是該理論第一次被用于實踐檢驗。本次科學家提出的探索火星也可以使用類似的軌道設計，這為今後探索火星提供了一種可能。（羅輯/編譯）
樂園追放 -Expelled from Paradise
from Wiki:
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/樂園追放_-Expelled_from_Paradise-
在地球爆發「奈米危機」大部分生態被摧毀後，98%的人類捨棄肉身，將自己人格數據化遷往部署在L1點的太空站「迪瓦（Diva）」的虛擬數據空間中生活。在2400年一股名為「弗隆提亞·賽格（Frontier Setter）」的力量不斷駭入「迪瓦」，「迪瓦」高層認為來源是來自地球地面上，所以派遣特工「安吉拉·巴爾扎克（Angela Balzac）」使用重新生成的肉體素體返回地面。和地面協助人員「丁格（Dingo）」尋找並摧毀其。安吉拉和丁格匯合後，在不斷的追尋中發現該力量並非原先所想的簡單，並且也改變了對自己所處的世界和地面人的世界的態度……
睇緊時有D對白Capture左系度Share的：
「所謂Frontier Setter計劃，是著眼於對地球環境的劇變，在外太空尋找可以居住的移民地的計劃」
「為了確保人類新生存圈的計劃，而且由於各國處於競爭關係，因此計劃是秘密進行的」
以下字反白，含劇透
印像中2013~2014年，有個好出名，提出trans-humanism既人加入左Google，而戲中2條橋，都係以移民外太空為前題
請問神仙巴打，會社在trans-humanism方面發展如何？在你的爆料範圍嗎？
from Wiki:
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/樂園追放_-Expelled_from_Paradise-
在地球爆發「奈米危機」大部分生態被摧毀後，98%的人類捨棄肉身，將自己人格數據化遷往部署在L1點的太空站「迪瓦（Diva）」的虛擬數據空間中生活。在2400年一股名為「弗隆提亞·賽格（Frontier Setter）」的力量不斷駭入「迪瓦」，「迪瓦」高層認為來源是來自地球地面上，所以派遣特工「安吉拉·巴爾扎克（Angela Balzac）」使用重新生成的肉體素體返回地面。和地面協助人員「丁格（Dingo）」尋找並摧毀其。安吉拉和丁格匯合後，在不斷的追尋中發現該力量並非原先所想的簡單，並且也改變了對自己所處的世界和地面人的世界的態度……
睇緊時有D對白Capture左系度Share的：
「所謂Frontier Setter計劃，是著眼於對地球環境的劇變，在外太空尋找可以居住的移民地的計劃」
「為了確保人類新生存圈的計劃，而且由於各國處於競爭關係，因此計劃是秘密進行的」
以下字反白，含劇透
印像中2013~2014年，有個好出名，提出trans-humanism既人加入左Google，而戲中2條橋，都係以移民外太空為前題
請問神仙巴打，會社在trans-humanism方面發展如何？在你的爆料範圍嗎？
'Transhumanists' are planning to upload your mind to a memory stick…
April 3rd, 2014
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/jamiebartlett/100013025/transhumanists-are-planning-to-upload-your-mind-to-a-memory-stick-and-extend-life-indefinitely-are-they-mad-dangerous-or-the-saviours-of-mankind/
The first Cybathlon, an Olympics for robot assisted parathletes, will take place in Switzerland in October 2016. For people with disabilities who are using advanced technologies – robotic limbs or brain-computer interfaces – to compete. The "Transhumanists" are overjoyed.
As the name implies, Transhumanists are people who want us to become "beyond human". It’s an umbrella term for a broad family of ideas united by the vision that technology now, or at least soon will, allow us to greatly enhance human intellectual, physical, and psychological capacities. That means everything from bionic limbs to uploading our entire brains on to memory sticks and carrying them around with us as back-up.
For most of us, the idea of robotic arms is far out. For the Transhumanists it’s probably the most uninteresting part of their speculations. Zoltan Istvan – a prominent Transhumanist writer – reckons functioning robotic limbs are only a decade away. And by the mid-2020s, it won’t just be people with disabilities using them: plenty of us will just prefer them. They can lift more. They won’t break as easily. From his home in California, Zoltan tells me via Skype that we’ll be having full Transhumanist Olympics by the 2030s, with all sorts of enhanced bionic humans competing.
I’m not sure how accurate his timeline is (scientists I’ve spoken to are more sceptical) but it’s certainly true that there are mind-boggling things under way. At Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden, scientists are already connecting robotic limbs to the human nervous system of amputees: the first arm surgeries are scheduled to occur in less than 12 months. Then there’s the "Iron Man" armour suit being created for American soldiers. Panasonic will be releasing an exoskeleton suit shortly. Injectable oxygen shots are already here. Some video games are already being played via mind-reading helmets. Enhanced contact lenses will soon allow people to have infrared night vision.
Transhumanism goes back some way before any of this of course. It formally started in the 1980s in California, but its roots are in the works of science fiction writers such as Isaac Asimov and the futurist biologist Julian Huxley, who coined the word in 1957. Transhumanism remains a smallish, but well-funded, movement. Humanity+, the largest formal umbrella group, has under 10,000 members from around the world, and they are usually rich Californians, technology geeks and scientists (sometimes all three). And it remains mostly confined to the West, although Korea, China, and Japan are budding outposts.
According to Zoltan – that is his real name, by the way, not a sci-fi pseudonym; he’s American-Hungarian – prospects are good. "Transhumanism is growing like crazy," he tells me. "There are now hundreds of online social media groups dedicated to our ideas, many with thousands of members each." He thinks Transhumanism – which has typically been populated by sci-fi nuts and mad scientist types – is starting to attract a broader following, and is becoming increasingly popular amongst the under-40s. Transhumanists include life extensionists, techno-optimists, Singularitons, bio-hackers, roboticists, Artificial Intelligence proponents and futurists who embrace radical science and technology to improve the human condition. "It’s grown by one thousand per cent in two years."
Even if you’ve not heard of these guys, and they are nearly all guys, you’ve probably come across some of the things they’re working on: Artificial General Intelligence (Marvin Minsky, considered the inventor of artificial intelligence, is prominent Transhumanist), mind uploading, megascale engineering, molecular manufacturing, autonomous self-replicating robotics, cybernetics, space colonisation, virtual reality, and cryonics.
If we can upgrade ourselves with technology, why not replace the body entirely? Plenty of Transhumanists plan to do exactly that. Ideas range from life-extension genetics to moving beyond our fleshy constraints entirely. Many think the big win is "mind uploading", which is sometimes called "Whole Brain Emulation". It is what it sounds like: mapping out all your brain’s neural pathways and putting them all on a memory stick that you can carry about with you.
If you accidently fall down a mineshaft: no problem! Re-upload yourself. That might be closer than we think. Ray Kurzweil – probably the world’s most famous Transhumanist, who works for Google – thinks that mind uploading will be possible some time in the middle of this century. (Again, most mainstream scientists are less convinced by Kurzweil’s estimates, which do seem fairly speculative. Other Transhumanists, like Dr Anders Sandberg from Oxford University, are more conservative.)
Zoltan is pretty keen on uploading, and has no qualms with existing as a data-cluster. I tell him I don’t much like the sound of it. "If you and I had the chance to become safer as living entities and also more powerful," he replies, "we’d certainly try it. And I think we might decide to stay there."
An introduction to Transhumanism by the British Institute of Posthuman Studies
The Transhumanists’ radical ideas are partly propelled by a darker concern: we need to upgrade ourselves to keep up with the machines. That’s something I think a lot of people worry about. What bothers them most is something called "the singularity". This refers to the point at which artificial intelligence becomes so smart that it starts making even smarter versions of itself, leaving us mortals trailing behind.
I cannot work out how serious this prospect really is – Kurzweil thinks mid-century (2045 to be exact, which seems disconcertingly precise). The Transhumanists themselves seem divided, although most agree that it’s at least a possibility this century. The fact that they’ve been predicting that singularity is just around the corner for the last 20 years without any sign of it arriving is mildly comforting. Still, you can’t afford to be complacent when it comes to super-intelligent machines running the planet. There's an awful lot of investment in artificial intelligence at the moment – notably at Kurzweil’s company, Google.
If you’re feeling a little uneasy about now, you’re not alone. Not everyone is happy about the Transhumanists. Francis Fukuyama – who coined the expression "the end of history" – has called Transhumanism "the most dangerous idea of the century". He thinks it is a strange liberation movement, "whose crusaders aim much higher than civil rights campaigners, feminists, or gay-rights advocates. This movement wants nothing less than to liberate the human race from its biological constraints.”
Fukayama is a little unfair on the Transhumanists. It’s a broad spectrum of thought. The Future of Humanity Institute at the University of Oxford has a fair number of Transhumanist academics. Much of their time is spent on carefully thinking through the ethics and morality of these technologies, and how they can be used in a way that is equitable and ethical. And plenty of Transhumanists are mainstream scientists working on extremely valuable medical projects, like providing better bionic limbs that could allow disabled people to live more active and fulfilling lives. This seems extremely necessary and important work.
But it’s correct that some others have slightly more unsettling projects. Eliminating suffering is one thing – but, as the YouTube video above makes clear, many Transhumanists want to eliminate the possibility of suffering, the ability to feel negative emotions.
A number of US Transhumanists have recently got together to crowd fund a "seastead", which is a floating community that would exist in international waters, outside any legal jurisdiction. Why? Possibly to conduct scientific research that usually gets snared up in university ethics committees. In Zoltan’s recent book, The Transhumanist Wager (which is fiction, he assures me), the Transhumanists manage to launch the third world war from their seastead "Transhumania".
The whole project throws up very difficult ethical and philosophical challenges. Is an uploaded mind still human? Should we give "human rights" to an artificial intelligence with a superior intellect to a human? Then there’s the bread-and-butter social problems. Presumably, human enhancement technologies would be disproportionately available to those with greater financial resources, creating a genetic divide. And if you lived forever, are you taking up the place of another generation? What about the more mundane things: what would be a fair prison sentence for murder if we could all live for 200 years? Or the right retirement age. I’m guessing it won’t be 70 if we can all make thirty score and ten. Above all: are we happy about all of this, and can we stop it?
Sometimes Tranhumanism does feel a bit like modern religion for an individualistic, technology-obsessed age: I want to live forever, so why shouldn’t I? Tech will help me do it and we’ll solve the problems later. But the catch, for me, is the sheer boredom of living for 10,000 years. I get bored on a slow Saturday afternoon. Zoltan enlightens me: "You’re asking me these questions, but I’m only answering based on our current brains. One day, our brains will be as big as the Empire State building – full of hundreds of thousands of servers. So no. I don’t see myself getting bored in 10,000 years." He pauses. "Well, I guess I’ve never been bored yet."
April 3rd, 2014
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/jamiebartlett/100013025/transhumanists-are-planning-to-upload-your-mind-to-a-memory-stick-and-extend-life-indefinitely-are-they-mad-dangerous-or-the-saviours-of-mankind/
The first Cybathlon, an Olympics for robot assisted parathletes, will take place in Switzerland in October 2016. For people with disabilities who are using advanced technologies – robotic limbs or brain-computer interfaces – to compete. The "Transhumanists" are overjoyed.
As the name implies, Transhumanists are people who want us to become "beyond human". It’s an umbrella term for a broad family of ideas united by the vision that technology now, or at least soon will, allow us to greatly enhance human intellectual, physical, and psychological capacities. That means everything from bionic limbs to uploading our entire brains on to memory sticks and carrying them around with us as back-up.
For most of us, the idea of robotic arms is far out. For the Transhumanists it’s probably the most uninteresting part of their speculations. Zoltan Istvan – a prominent Transhumanist writer – reckons functioning robotic limbs are only a decade away. And by the mid-2020s, it won’t just be people with disabilities using them: plenty of us will just prefer them. They can lift more. They won’t break as easily. From his home in California, Zoltan tells me via Skype that we’ll be having full Transhumanist Olympics by the 2030s, with all sorts of enhanced bionic humans competing.
I’m not sure how accurate his timeline is (scientists I’ve spoken to are more sceptical) but it’s certainly true that there are mind-boggling things under way. At Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden, scientists are already connecting robotic limbs to the human nervous system of amputees: the first arm surgeries are scheduled to occur in less than 12 months. Then there’s the "Iron Man" armour suit being created for American soldiers. Panasonic will be releasing an exoskeleton suit shortly. Injectable oxygen shots are already here. Some video games are already being played via mind-reading helmets. Enhanced contact lenses will soon allow people to have infrared night vision.
Transhumanism goes back some way before any of this of course. It formally started in the 1980s in California, but its roots are in the works of science fiction writers such as Isaac Asimov and the futurist biologist Julian Huxley, who coined the word in 1957. Transhumanism remains a smallish, but well-funded, movement. Humanity+, the largest formal umbrella group, has under 10,000 members from around the world, and they are usually rich Californians, technology geeks and scientists (sometimes all three). And it remains mostly confined to the West, although Korea, China, and Japan are budding outposts.
According to Zoltan – that is his real name, by the way, not a sci-fi pseudonym; he’s American-Hungarian – prospects are good. "Transhumanism is growing like crazy," he tells me. "There are now hundreds of online social media groups dedicated to our ideas, many with thousands of members each." He thinks Transhumanism – which has typically been populated by sci-fi nuts and mad scientist types – is starting to attract a broader following, and is becoming increasingly popular amongst the under-40s. Transhumanists include life extensionists, techno-optimists, Singularitons, bio-hackers, roboticists, Artificial Intelligence proponents and futurists who embrace radical science and technology to improve the human condition. "It’s grown by one thousand per cent in two years."
Even if you’ve not heard of these guys, and they are nearly all guys, you’ve probably come across some of the things they’re working on: Artificial General Intelligence (Marvin Minsky, considered the inventor of artificial intelligence, is prominent Transhumanist), mind uploading, megascale engineering, molecular manufacturing, autonomous self-replicating robotics, cybernetics, space colonisation, virtual reality, and cryonics.
If we can upgrade ourselves with technology, why not replace the body entirely? Plenty of Transhumanists plan to do exactly that. Ideas range from life-extension genetics to moving beyond our fleshy constraints entirely. Many think the big win is "mind uploading", which is sometimes called "Whole Brain Emulation". It is what it sounds like: mapping out all your brain’s neural pathways and putting them all on a memory stick that you can carry about with you.
If you accidently fall down a mineshaft: no problem! Re-upload yourself. That might be closer than we think. Ray Kurzweil – probably the world’s most famous Transhumanist, who works for Google – thinks that mind uploading will be possible some time in the middle of this century. (Again, most mainstream scientists are less convinced by Kurzweil’s estimates, which do seem fairly speculative. Other Transhumanists, like Dr Anders Sandberg from Oxford University, are more conservative.)
Zoltan is pretty keen on uploading, and has no qualms with existing as a data-cluster. I tell him I don’t much like the sound of it. "If you and I had the chance to become safer as living entities and also more powerful," he replies, "we’d certainly try it. And I think we might decide to stay there."
An introduction to Transhumanism by the British Institute of Posthuman Studies
The Transhumanists’ radical ideas are partly propelled by a darker concern: we need to upgrade ourselves to keep up with the machines. That’s something I think a lot of people worry about. What bothers them most is something called "the singularity". This refers to the point at which artificial intelligence becomes so smart that it starts making even smarter versions of itself, leaving us mortals trailing behind.
I cannot work out how serious this prospect really is – Kurzweil thinks mid-century (2045 to be exact, which seems disconcertingly precise). The Transhumanists themselves seem divided, although most agree that it’s at least a possibility this century. The fact that they’ve been predicting that singularity is just around the corner for the last 20 years without any sign of it arriving is mildly comforting. Still, you can’t afford to be complacent when it comes to super-intelligent machines running the planet. There's an awful lot of investment in artificial intelligence at the moment – notably at Kurzweil’s company, Google.
If you’re feeling a little uneasy about now, you’re not alone. Not everyone is happy about the Transhumanists. Francis Fukuyama – who coined the expression "the end of history" – has called Transhumanism "the most dangerous idea of the century". He thinks it is a strange liberation movement, "whose crusaders aim much higher than civil rights campaigners, feminists, or gay-rights advocates. This movement wants nothing less than to liberate the human race from its biological constraints.”
Fukayama is a little unfair on the Transhumanists. It’s a broad spectrum of thought. The Future of Humanity Institute at the University of Oxford has a fair number of Transhumanist academics. Much of their time is spent on carefully thinking through the ethics and morality of these technologies, and how they can be used in a way that is equitable and ethical. And plenty of Transhumanists are mainstream scientists working on extremely valuable medical projects, like providing better bionic limbs that could allow disabled people to live more active and fulfilling lives. This seems extremely necessary and important work.
But it’s correct that some others have slightly more unsettling projects. Eliminating suffering is one thing – but, as the YouTube video above makes clear, many Transhumanists want to eliminate the possibility of suffering, the ability to feel negative emotions.
A number of US Transhumanists have recently got together to crowd fund a "seastead", which is a floating community that would exist in international waters, outside any legal jurisdiction. Why? Possibly to conduct scientific research that usually gets snared up in university ethics committees. In Zoltan’s recent book, The Transhumanist Wager (which is fiction, he assures me), the Transhumanists manage to launch the third world war from their seastead "Transhumania".
The whole project throws up very difficult ethical and philosophical challenges. Is an uploaded mind still human? Should we give "human rights" to an artificial intelligence with a superior intellect to a human? Then there’s the bread-and-butter social problems. Presumably, human enhancement technologies would be disproportionately available to those with greater financial resources, creating a genetic divide. And if you lived forever, are you taking up the place of another generation? What about the more mundane things: what would be a fair prison sentence for murder if we could all live for 200 years? Or the right retirement age. I’m guessing it won’t be 70 if we can all make thirty score and ten. Above all: are we happy about all of this, and can we stop it?
Sometimes Tranhumanism does feel a bit like modern religion for an individualistic, technology-obsessed age: I want to live forever, so why shouldn’t I? Tech will help me do it and we’ll solve the problems later. But the catch, for me, is the sheer boredom of living for 10,000 years. I get bored on a slow Saturday afternoon. Zoltan enlightens me: "You’re asking me these questions, but I’m only answering based on our current brains. One day, our brains will be as big as the Empire State building – full of hundreds of thousands of servers. So no. I don’t see myself getting bored in 10,000 years." He pauses. "Well, I guess I’ve never been bored yet."
警犬狗到同一件事，可以用兩條唔同罪名告兩個人
梁 國 雄 郭 綺 華 報 稱 遭 對 方 襲 擊 案 件 押 後 下 月 審 前 覆 核
2015-01-06 HKT 11:19
社 民 連 立 法 會 議 員 梁 國 雄 及 「 保 衞 香 港 運 動 」 成 員 郭 綺 華 ， 去 年 7 月 出 席 本 台 節 目 《 城 市 論 壇 》 時 ， 雙 方 都 報 稱 被 對 方 襲 擊 ， 案 件 在 東 區 裁 判 法 院 提 堂 ， 法 庭 將 案 件 押 後 至 下 月 3 日 作 審 前 覆 核 。
梁 國 雄 被 控 一 項 普 通 襲 擊 罪 ， 郭 綺 華 則 被 控 一 項 在 公 眾 地 方 作 出 擾 亂 秩 序 行 為 罪 ， 兩 人 都 否 認 控 罪 。
裁 判 官 向 控 方 提 出 ， 為 何 兩 人 在 同 一 案 件 和 情 況 下 ， 會 被 檢 控 兩 項 不 同 控 罪 。 梁 國 雄 亦 提 出 ， 如 此 做 法 會 扭 曲 案 情 ， 或 會 令 公 正 不 能 彰 顯 ， 對 律 政 司 的 決 定 感 到 失 望 。
裁 判 官 最 後 決 定 ， 先 作 審 前 覆 核 ， 並 提 醒 梁 國 雄 ， 如 果 覺 得 有 關 檢 控 會 對 他 造 成 不 利 ， 應 尋 求 法 律 意 見 ， 是 否 要 求 將 兩 人 的 案 件 分 開 處 理 。
梁 國 雄 郭 綺 華 報 稱 遭 對 方 襲 擊 案 件 押 後 下 月 審 前 覆 核
2015-01-06 HKT 11:19
社 民 連 立 法 會 議 員 梁 國 雄 及 「 保 衞 香 港 運 動 」 成 員 郭 綺 華 ， 去 年 7 月 出 席 本 台 節 目 《 城 市 論 壇 》 時 ， 雙 方 都 報 稱 被 對 方 襲 擊 ， 案 件 在 東 區 裁 判 法 院 提 堂 ， 法 庭 將 案 件 押 後 至 下 月 3 日 作 審 前 覆 核 。
梁 國 雄 被 控 一 項 普 通 襲 擊 罪 ， 郭 綺 華 則 被 控 一 項 在 公 眾 地 方 作 出 擾 亂 秩 序 行 為 罪 ， 兩 人 都 否 認 控 罪 。
裁 判 官 向 控 方 提 出 ， 為 何 兩 人 在 同 一 案 件 和 情 況 下 ， 會 被 檢 控 兩 項 不 同 控 罪 。 梁 國 雄 亦 提 出 ， 如 此 做 法 會 扭 曲 案 情 ， 或 會 令 公 正 不 能 彰 顯 ， 對 律 政 司 的 決 定 感 到 失 望 。
裁 判 官 最 後 決 定 ， 先 作 審 前 覆 核 ， 並 提 醒 梁 國 雄 ， 如 果 覺 得 有 關 檢 控 會 對 他 造 成 不 利 ， 應 尋 求 法 律 意 見 ， 是 否 要 求 將 兩 人 的 案 件 分 開 處 理 。
Ray Kurzweil Says He’s Breathing Intelligence into Google Search
June 26, 2014
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/528656/ray-kurzweil-says-hes-breathing-intelligence-into-google-search/
Inventor and futurist Ray Kurzweil says work is under way at Google to apply his theory of intelligence to understanding online information.
The big announcements at Google’s I/O event in San Francisco Wednesday didn’t mention Web search, the technology that got the company started and made it so successful. But in a small session later that day, the inventor and futurist Ray Kurzweil talked confidently about making Google’s current search technology obsolete.
Kurzweil joined the company 18 months ago to lead a project aimed at creating software capable of understanding text as well as humans can. Yesterday, he told the audience that progress on this effort was good, and that it would result in an entirely new way to search the Web and manage information.
“You would interact with it like you would a human assistant,” said Kurzweil. It will be possible to ask a question of the software just as you would if talking to another person, he said; and you could trust that it would return a fully reasoned answer, not just a list of links as Google’s search engine does today. Such a virtual assistant might also take the initiative, Kurzweil said, coming forward when new information had appeared that was related to an earlier query or conversation.
Kurzweil said the technology will eventually be as widely used as Google’s current search engine, and its scope will extend beyond text documents. He also predicted that specialized chips designed to implement key parts of the information processing involved would make the technology cheaper to deploy.
Kurzweil gave few details of how the software would work, but he said it was based on the theory of intelligence expounded in his 2012 book How to Create a Mind. Kurzweil’s theory is that all functions in the neocortex, the wrinkled outer layer of our brains that is the seat of reasoning and abstract thought, are based on systems that use a hierarchy of pattern recognition to process information. Each layer, he argues, uses the output of the ones below it to work with increasingly complex and abstract patterns.
In the case of reading text, Kurzweil claims, our brain first recognizes individual letters. It can then proceed to understand the words they form; then the meaning of phrases or sentences; and eventually the thought or argument the person who wrote them is trying to convey.
Google’s current search technology is able to understand only the lower levels of that hierarchy, such as synonyms for individual words, says Kurzweil. It can’t synthesize that low-level knowledge to build up understanding of higher-level concepts.
The idea of building intelligent software that looks for successive levels of patterns in data isn’t exclusive to Kurzweil. He said his group is using a technique known as “hierarchical hidden Markov models,” in use for over a decade. More recently, Google, Facebook, and other companies have seen major leaps in speech recognition and other areas using a newer approach known as deep learning, which is based on large networks of simulated neurons arranged into hierarchies (see “Google Puts Its Virtual Brain to Work”).
Yet no one has created software that can construct complex knowledge or understanding from simple building blocks, said Kurzweil. “That has so far eluded the AI field,” he said. “We have a model that I believe will solve this key problem of being able to add to the hierarchy automatically.”
Kurzweil’s claims about human intelligence and the neocortex are somewhat controversial. Gary Marcus, a psychology professor at NYU, has said that the theory is simplistic and unsupported by evidence from neuroscience.
Kurzweil said Wednesday that his ideas were backed by evidence and talked of using them to create software with faculties not far removed from those of humans. He has estimated that to functionally emulate the human brain, a computer would need to perform around 100 trillion calculations per second. “It would be hard to provide that to a billion users, although I’ve discussed that with Larry Page and he thinks it’s possible,” he said.
Kurzweil even gave a qualified “yes” when asked if systems built that way might ever become conscious. “Whether or not an entity has consciousness is not a scientific question, because there’s no falsifiable experiment you could run,” he said. “People disagree about animals, and they will disagree about AIs. My leap of faith is that if an entity seems conscious and to be having the experiences it claims, then it is conscious.”
June 26, 2014
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/528656/ray-kurzweil-says-hes-breathing-intelligence-into-google-search/
Inventor and futurist Ray Kurzweil says work is under way at Google to apply his theory of intelligence to understanding online information.
The big announcements at Google’s I/O event in San Francisco Wednesday didn’t mention Web search, the technology that got the company started and made it so successful. But in a small session later that day, the inventor and futurist Ray Kurzweil talked confidently about making Google’s current search technology obsolete.
Kurzweil joined the company 18 months ago to lead a project aimed at creating software capable of understanding text as well as humans can. Yesterday, he told the audience that progress on this effort was good, and that it would result in an entirely new way to search the Web and manage information.
“You would interact with it like you would a human assistant,” said Kurzweil. It will be possible to ask a question of the software just as you would if talking to another person, he said; and you could trust that it would return a fully reasoned answer, not just a list of links as Google’s search engine does today. Such a virtual assistant might also take the initiative, Kurzweil said, coming forward when new information had appeared that was related to an earlier query or conversation.
Kurzweil said the technology will eventually be as widely used as Google’s current search engine, and its scope will extend beyond text documents. He also predicted that specialized chips designed to implement key parts of the information processing involved would make the technology cheaper to deploy.
Kurzweil gave few details of how the software would work, but he said it was based on the theory of intelligence expounded in his 2012 book How to Create a Mind. Kurzweil’s theory is that all functions in the neocortex, the wrinkled outer layer of our brains that is the seat of reasoning and abstract thought, are based on systems that use a hierarchy of pattern recognition to process information. Each layer, he argues, uses the output of the ones below it to work with increasingly complex and abstract patterns.
In the case of reading text, Kurzweil claims, our brain first recognizes individual letters. It can then proceed to understand the words they form; then the meaning of phrases or sentences; and eventually the thought or argument the person who wrote them is trying to convey.
Google’s current search technology is able to understand only the lower levels of that hierarchy, such as synonyms for individual words, says Kurzweil. It can’t synthesize that low-level knowledge to build up understanding of higher-level concepts.
The idea of building intelligent software that looks for successive levels of patterns in data isn’t exclusive to Kurzweil. He said his group is using a technique known as “hierarchical hidden Markov models,” in use for over a decade. More recently, Google, Facebook, and other companies have seen major leaps in speech recognition and other areas using a newer approach known as deep learning, which is based on large networks of simulated neurons arranged into hierarchies (see “Google Puts Its Virtual Brain to Work”).
Yet no one has created software that can construct complex knowledge or understanding from simple building blocks, said Kurzweil. “That has so far eluded the AI field,” he said. “We have a model that I believe will solve this key problem of being able to add to the hierarchy automatically.”
Kurzweil’s claims about human intelligence and the neocortex are somewhat controversial. Gary Marcus, a psychology professor at NYU, has said that the theory is simplistic and unsupported by evidence from neuroscience.
Kurzweil said Wednesday that his ideas were backed by evidence and talked of using them to create software with faculties not far removed from those of humans. He has estimated that to functionally emulate the human brain, a computer would need to perform around 100 trillion calculations per second. “It would be hard to provide that to a billion users, although I’ve discussed that with Larry Page and he thinks it’s possible,” he said.
Kurzweil even gave a qualified “yes” when asked if systems built that way might ever become conscious. “Whether or not an entity has consciousness is not a scientific question, because there’s no falsifiable experiment you could run,” he said. “People disagree about animals, and they will disagree about AIs. My leap of faith is that if an entity seems conscious and to be having the experiences it claims, then it is conscious.”
樂園追放 -Expelled from Paradise
from Wiki:
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/樂園追放_-Expelled_from_Paradise-
在地球爆發「奈米危機」大部分生態被摧毀後，98%的人類捨棄肉身，將自己人格數據化遷往部署在L1點的太空站「迪瓦（Diva）」的虛擬數據空間中生活。在2400年一股名為「弗隆提亞·賽格（Frontier Setter）」的力量不斷駭入「迪瓦」，「迪瓦」高層認為來源是來自地球地面上，所以派遣特工「安吉拉·巴爾扎克（Angela Balzac）」使用重新生成的肉體素體返回地面。和地面協助人員「丁格（Dingo）」尋找並摧毀其。安吉拉和丁格匯合後，在不斷的追尋中發現該力量並非原先所想的簡單，並且也改變了對自己所處的世界和地面人的世界的態度……
睇緊時有D對白Capture左系度Share的：
「所謂Frontier Setter計劃，是著眼於對地球環境的劇變，在外太空尋找可以居住的移民地的計劃」
「為了確保人類新生存圈的計劃，而且由於各國處於競爭關係，因此計劃是秘密進行的」
以下字反白，含劇透
印像中2013~2014年，有個好出名，提出trans-humanism既人加入左Google，而戲中2條橋，都係以移民外太空為前題
請問神仙巴打，會社在trans-humanism方面發展如何？在你的爆料範圍嗎？
記得上年好似有個俄羅斯富翁打算將自己個腦複製上雲端，唔知最尾有冇成事
1) 見乜乜運程, BLOG 不約而同講, 亞洲金融可能六月七月出事!!!![[shocking]](/face/hkg/shocking.gif)
2) 索羅斯可能返來香港報仇 , 見曾蔭權, 任志剛 同埋 許仕仁 唔係官場
咁就要睇下夾爆冥紙定夾爆港紙搵得多d啦
由於 rmb 不是國際貨幣所以夾爆港元比較容易好多。
紙揸
會美
變元
廢算
紙，
港元掛美元都會變廢紙？
![[yipes]](/face/hkg/yipes.gif)
粵語固有的雙音節詞彙不少是與普通話語素順序相反的，如今這一類詞正在逐漸減少。粵語詞彙正在不知不覺中慢性死亡，令人擔憂。
1896年香港出版的中英詞典（W. Lobcheid）中收錄的這一類粵語詞中可以找出100多條當時還在使用，現在已經死亡，改用了普通話詞的。例如：
已死亡的粵語雙音節反序詞——官話（普通話）詞
手提電話--------手x(個機字太不雅用x代替)
耳筒-------耳x(個機字太不雅用x代替)
亂咁屈人------亂扣帽子
開幕典禮------開幕式
硬碟-------硬盤
質素——素質
宵夜——夜宵
今日——今天
追加:兩回事---兩碼子事
一部---一台
孖寶兄弟--------馬利奧兄弟
超音鼠----索尼克
sony貓-----索尼貓
好勁------給力
醜聞------黑材料
手提機---掌機
多羅貓--多樂貓
影片/短片---視頻
團隊--班子
二奶/第三者---小三
五十日移動平均線---五十天移動平均線
太空人-----航天員
另一方面-----那邊廂
一系列----一籃子
重點-亮點
鏡頭---攝像頭
想當年----那些年
有錢仔----富二代
有錢佬----土豪
新力------索尼
低調處理------冷處理
失踨------失聯
索尼罪犯滔天 psv亞太區有一天成為亞太區直 電話有伏 psn被hack
完全唔同新力時代
只因改咗個蝗虫名
利器-神器
閃電結婚-閃婚
在普通話的強力進攻之下，這類詞正在不斷減少。例如「質素」「硬碟」現在已經很少聽到了，年青人都說「素質」、「硬盤」了。
Hi Hi!!!扣帽子,今天,一台都係共產中文o黎!!!!
例:你唔好亂扣我五毛帽子喎!!!錯
應該:你唔好屈我係五毛喎
例:我今天好開心 錯
應該:我今日好開心
例:呢台電腦好靚喎!!!同我部手X交換啦!!! 錯(個機字太不雅,用X代替)
應該呢部電腦好靚喎!!!同我部手提電話交換啦!!
手x不嬲都係香港野
手提可以指好多野..
1896年香港出版的中英詞典（W. Lobcheid）中收錄的這一類粵語詞中可以找出100多條當時還在使用，現在已經死亡，改用了普通話詞的。例如：
已死亡的粵語雙音節反序詞——官話（普通話）詞
手提電話--------手x(個機字太不雅用x代替)
耳筒-------耳x(個機字太不雅用x代替)
亂咁屈人------亂扣帽子
開幕典禮------開幕式
硬碟-------硬盤
質素——素質
宵夜——夜宵
今日——今天
追加:兩回事---兩碼子事
一部---一台
孖寶兄弟--------馬利奧兄弟
超音鼠----索尼克
sony貓-----索尼貓
好勁------給力
醜聞------黑材料
手提機---掌機
多羅貓--多樂貓
影片/短片---視頻
團隊--班子
二奶/第三者---小三
五十日移動平均線---五十天移動平均線
太空人-----航天員
另一方面-----那邊廂
一系列----一籃子
重點-亮點
鏡頭---攝像頭
想當年----那些年
有錢仔----富二代
有錢佬----土豪
新力------索尼
低調處理------冷處理
失踨------失聯
索尼罪犯滔天 psv亞太區有一天成為亞太區直 電話有伏 psn被hack
完全唔同新力時代
只因改咗個蝗虫名
利器-神器
閃電結婚-閃婚
在普通話的強力進攻之下，這類詞正在不斷減少。例如「質素」「硬碟」現在已經很少聽到了，年青人都說「素質」、「硬盤」了。
Hi Hi!!!扣帽子,今天,一台都係共產中文o黎!!!!
例:你唔好亂扣我五毛帽子喎!!!錯
應該:你唔好屈我係五毛喎
例:我今天好開心 錯
應該:我今日好開心
例:呢台電腦好靚喎!!!同我部手X交換啦!!! 錯(個機字太不雅,用X代替)
應該呢部電腦好靚喎!!!同我部手提電話交換啦!!
手x不嬲都係香港野
手提可以指好多野..
其實我支持用土豪黎形容班大陸人![[369]](/face/hkg/369.gif)
秒後自動載入第 24 頁
| 上一頁 | 下一頁 |
| 發表 |