| 發表文章 | 發起投票 |
| 上一頁 | 下一頁 |
又到爆料&討論時間(56)
多謝大家繼續支持 
過去網友們很多問題都已經記錄在以下的舊 post 裡, 特別是有關軍工電腦/共濟會/梁賊的過去/滅共/儲糧/cash is king/開松果體/冥想/NWO/BNO/大小 Picture/香港大 Picture 和 美元 都可以在過去的 post 裡找到, 各位新來的巴打可以慢慢邊飲咖啡/朱古力邊閱讀 (爬文), 之後才參與討論以免問題不段重複影響大家討論的氣氛, 謝謝.
如果有記者朋友 or 巴打想借用過去及這裡的內容煩請註明出處, 謝謝.
以下是世界各地的支持者
有一點我要強調, 英國是責任上要幫 bno 香港人, 但美國是沒有責任幫香港人的, 如果任何香港人諗住不用付出就有美國為香港人打生打死, 呢 d 香港人不救也吧! 自己家園都唔主動保護仲要指意一個完全無任何責任的美國去打救, 真係連共匪都睇呢 d 人唔起呀.
會社要消滅共匪可以話係天職, 但消滅共匪唔一定要救香港人, 這是道理. 美國就是睇到很多香港人都不自愛只望著美國打救 (當中仲有唔少是主動出賣香港), 所以遲遲都唔肯主動派兵保護香港雖然香港有幾千億美元的儲備 (儲備放在那裡我 "唔講得").
注意:
a. 所有與我爆料內容無關的文章請開新 post 自行討論；另外也請勿 post 任何5毛的文章，我會視為5毛而封鎖有關網友的。
b. 如果網友的問題與我爆料內容無關的 or 涉及我家人/我個人私隱/想起我底的，我一律不答。
c. 由於我爆料的重點不是傳教為免網友誤會，請不要問我有關基督宗教的睇法 or 解釋聖經內的章節，網友可以自行開新 post 討論。
d. 為了不讓共匪有所準備我是不會透露任何 action 的日期和有關策略/戰略，請網友們不要再問。
e. 所有問我某某是否會員的問題除非有非常充份的理由能夠說服我，否則一律不答。
如果有網友因為以上幾點而不能得到我的答案謹止至歉。
請大家在之前的 post 傾爆後再到這裡繼續討論
過去網友們很多問題都已經記錄在以下的舊 post 裡, 特別是有關軍工電腦/共濟會/梁賊的過去/滅共/儲糧/cash is king/開松果體/冥想/NWO/BNO/大小 Picture/香港大 Picture 和 美元 都可以在過去的 post 裡找到, 各位新來的巴打可以慢慢邊飲咖啡/朱古力邊閱讀 (爬文), 之後才參與討論以免問題不段重複影響大家討論的氣氛, 謝謝.
如果有記者朋友 or 巴打想借用過去及這裡的內容煩請註明出處, 謝謝.
以下是世界各地的支持者
有一點我要強調, 英國是責任上要幫 bno 香港人, 但美國是沒有責任幫香港人的, 如果任何香港人諗住不用付出就有美國為香港人打生打死, 呢 d 香港人不救也吧! 自己家園都唔主動保護仲要指意一個完全無任何責任的美國去打救, 真係連共匪都睇呢 d 人唔起呀.
會社要消滅共匪可以話係天職, 但消滅共匪唔一定要救香港人, 這是道理. 美國就是睇到很多香港人都不自愛只望著美國打救 (當中仲有唔少是主動出賣香港), 所以遲遲都唔肯主動派兵保護香港雖然香港有幾千億美元的儲備 (儲備放在那裡我 "唔講得").
注意:
a. 所有與我爆料內容無關的文章請開新 post 自行討論；另外也請勿 post 任何5毛的文章，我會視為5毛而封鎖有關網友的。
b. 如果網友的問題與我爆料內容無關的 or 涉及我家人/我個人私隱/想起我底的，我一律不答。
c. 由於我爆料的重點不是傳教為免網友誤會，請不要問我有關基督宗教的睇法 or 解釋聖經內的章節，網友可以自行開新 post 討論。
d. 為了不讓共匪有所準備我是不會透露任何 action 的日期和有關策略/戰略，請網友們不要再問。
e. 所有問我某某是否會員的問題除非有非常充份的理由能夠說服我，否則一律不答。
如果有網友因為以上幾點而不能得到我的答案謹止至歉。
請大家在之前的 post 傾爆後再到這裡繼續討論
本貼文共有 1001 個回覆
此貼文已鎖，將不接受回覆
SOURCE: Martin Oei 黃世澤 - http://blog.martinoei.com/2015/01/香港賊竇數據中心/![[shocking]](/face/hkg/shocking.gif)
黃之鋒喺facebook上表示，佢個GMail懷疑被中國黑客hack咗，留低以上腳毛。有IP，小弟就有得查，根據APNIC紀錄，查到以下咁嘅嘢。
Screen Shot 2015-01-07 at 12.19.25 am
上面有個叫kf-idc.com嘅domain，一查，發現係以下中國賊竇公司嘅C&C
Screen Shot 2015-01-07 at 12.16.46 am
呢間嘢報稱機房喺
SOURCE: Martin Oei 黃世澤 - http://blog.martinoei.com/2015/01/香港賊竇數據中心/
Trace 得好
神仙兄，係咪真係有耶穌會？
佢地同羅斯紫爾德家族有冇關係？
無關係
SOURCE: Martin Oei 黃世澤 - http://blog.martinoei.com/2015/01/香港賊竇數據中心/
黃之鋒喺facebook上表示，佢個GMail懷疑被中國黑客hack咗，留低以上腳毛。有IP，小弟就有得查，根據APNIC紀錄，查到以下咁嘅嘢。
Screen Shot 2015-01-07 at 12.19.25 am
上面有個叫kf-idc.com嘅domain，一查，發現係以下中國賊竇公司嘅C&C
Screen Shot 2015-01-07 at 12.16.46 am
呢間嘢報稱機房喺
SOURCE: Martin Oei 黃世澤 - http://blog.martinoei.com/2015/01/香港賊竇數據中心/
宗移動香港公司係葵涌呢棟大廈內
鬼國外交部旗下嘅影子公司好多手腳，嚟緊呢年搞好多events係針對港臺嘅年輕人……個人感覺唔止“聯誼”咁簡單，究竟共匪想對後生仔做乜?
Ps:啲維穩活動係由香港出錢咁多年夾夾埋埋，同大白象工程有得揮
共匪想利誘和死誘年青人囉。
咩叫死誘
Sorry, 係色誘
大家有無用iphone or ipad睇post，就算bookmark了當去到第２８頁之後就會無左追頁功能
次次都係咁，係咪bug黎架![[sosad]](/face/hkg/sosad.gif)
咁搞法真係唔記得睇到邊一頁
次次都係咁，係咪bug黎架
咁搞法真係唔記得睇到邊一頁 
SOURCE: Martin Oei 黃世澤 - http://blog.martinoei.com/2015/01/香港賊竇數據中心/
黃之鋒喺facebook上表示，佢個GMail懷疑被中國黑客hack咗，留低以上腳毛。有IP，小弟就有得查，根據APNIC紀錄，查到以下咁嘅嘢。
Screen Shot 2015-01-07 at 12.19.25 am
上面有個叫kf-idc.com嘅domain，一查，發現係以下中國賊竇公司嘅C&C
Screen Shot 2015-01-07 at 12.16.46 am
呢間嘢報稱機房喺
SOURCE: Martin Oei 黃世澤 - http://blog.martinoei.com/2015/01/香港賊竇數據中心/
Trace 得好
會不會收佢皮
你試下讀出黎 / 當歌仔咁唱出黎應該估到。
即係亞月球姐？
其實$65三個月真係算平，我用“亡國興”嘅思維同各位巴絲打計一計數。
$65÷12集=大約$5.5一集，一集約一個鐘，以呢個價錢，去網吧一個鐘都唔得啦，所以請大家支持有質素嘅網台，雖然是少少錢，但我覺得係對有質素嘅人所做嘅嘢的一種認同，因為佢d嘢係得，我先至會買嘅啫。如果唔得、無質素，就算係免費我都唔會要。
我一直會支持！
你試下讀出黎 / 當歌仔咁唱出黎應該估到。
即係亞月球姐？
其實$65三個月真係算平，我用“亡國興”嘅思維同各位巴絲打計一計數。
$65÷12集=大約$5.5一集，一集約一個鐘，以呢個價錢，去網吧一個鐘都唔得啦，所以請大家支持有質素嘅網台，雖然是少少錢，但我覺得係對有質素嘅人所做嘅嘢的一種認同，因為佢d嘢係得，我先至會買嘅啫。如果唔得、無質素，就算係免費我都唔會要。
我一直會支持！
都覺得佢係有問題,成日講到好有愛,但我覺得好假
我感覺唔到
你們不要和我耍官腔啦，很討厭，我已經作好下台階給你們，不用公開道歉，但你們既然要耍官腔，我亦不會和你讓步，都是這句，星期五前，沒有書面道歉，沒有書面誠絡，我一定同你地開年，仲會圖文並貿，甚至我一定會執著我手上的證據去報館及報警。
你們出賣我的信任及友情，毫無道義，如果我仲啞忍，我仲洗出來網台行既？？？
大不了回去做design，我已經準備好玩到玉石俱焚的一步，你們準備好未？
玩到咁大
我覺得唔似偷錄分享咁簡單，應該有d更嚴重既野搞到卓飛
阿月婆愈來愈走火入魔,早輪好似同雲海反反地面. 台上單打雲海(第十五公里:「UFO議會現場」part one)
唔好比E條8婆去夏威夷.至L憎D五毛去歐美, 影響市容, 月婆滾回中國
https://youtube.com/watch?v=xyUBRnc3Dag
22:40
Dark side of the Moon
1) 見乜乜運程, BLOG 不約而同講, 亞洲金融可能六月七月出事!!!
2) 索羅斯可能返來香港報仇 , 見曾蔭權, 任志剛 同埋 許仕仁 唔係官場
咁就要睇下夾爆冥紙定夾爆港紙搵得多d啦
由於 rmb 不是國際貨幣所以夾爆港元比較容易好多。
紙揸
會美
變元
廢算
紙，
港元掛美元都會變廢紙？![[yipes]](/face/hkg/yipes.gif)
逼你個外掛系統同佢一齊燒銀紙，係一個睇吓邊個子彈多嘅遊戲
如果外匯儲備真係無哂，其實個系統一早玩完？
外匯儲備係會社睇的，唔會比共匪攞到
請問港紙都可能會爆煲, Cash is King 是否以港幣換美金放家中安全地方仲好?
請問港紙都可能會爆煲, Cash is King 是否以港幣換美金放家中安全地方仲好?
各位，就算唔爬文最起碼都Google咗先好嗎?
https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&q=site%3Ahkgalden.com+又到爆料+"Cash+is+King"
http://hkgalden.com/view/178188/page/10
中共倒台已開始，記得 hold cash 呀，如果有股票的快些止賺 hold cash，其實現在是做大戲前的歌舞升平，有股票的好襯高位放手。
btw,中共倒台開始不等於立刻倒台，開始到完結中間是有過程的包括戰爭/內亂/暗殺/逃亡和很多不開心的過程，各位仍舊有自己要過的日子/生活/考試/上課/返工之類，到了大事大非的人生交叉點時憑著良知去決定吧。
渣打裁員100人...
真係愈黎愈近...
真係愈黎愈近...
終於註冊到
《路透》：渣打結束全球股票業務 炒200人
來源: http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realtime/finance/20150108/53311067
路透》報道，渣打（2888）關閉全球現貨股票業務，將導致全球裁員約200人，另外，同時關閉資本市場業務。
本報消息人士指，渣打股票及衍生工具部目前運作正常，窩輪及牛熊證目前開價亦如常，有關結束全球現貨股票業務的事宜，將於短期內有正式公佈。
本報記者致電渣打股票部熱線查詢，職員表示暫時未收到有關消息，仍可幫助客戶執行指令。
渣打報113.8元，升1.8%，成交3160萬元。《路透》：渣打結束全球股票業務 炒200人
來源: http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realtime/finance/20150108/53311067
路透》報道，渣打（2888）關閉全球現貨股票業務，將導致全球裁員約200人，另外，同時關閉資本市場業務。
本報消息人士指，渣打股票及衍生工具部目前運作正常，窩輪及牛熊證目前開價亦如常，有關結束全球現貨股票業務的事宜，將於短期內有正式公佈。
本報記者致電渣打股票部熱線查詢，職員表示暫時未收到有關消息，仍可幫助客戶執行指令。
渣打報113.8元，升1.8%，成交3160萬元。
SCB 內部已經預料到全球股市將會大鑊所以提前作出步署。
來源: http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realtime/finance/20150108/53311067
路透》報道，渣打（2888）關閉全球現貨股票業務，將導致全球裁員約200人，另外，同時關閉資本市場業務。
本報消息人士指，渣打股票及衍生工具部目前運作正常，窩輪及牛熊證目前開價亦如常，有關結束全球現貨股票業務的事宜，將於短期內有正式公佈。
本報記者致電渣打股票部熱線查詢，職員表示暫時未收到有關消息，仍可幫助客戶執行指令。
渣打報113.8元，升1.8%，成交3160萬元。《路透》：渣打結束全球股票業務 炒200人
來源: http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realtime/finance/20150108/53311067
路透》報道，渣打（2888）關閉全球現貨股票業務，將導致全球裁員約200人，另外，同時關閉資本市場業務。
本報消息人士指，渣打股票及衍生工具部目前運作正常，窩輪及牛熊證目前開價亦如常，有關結束全球現貨股票業務的事宜，將於短期內有正式公佈。
本報記者致電渣打股票部熱線查詢，職員表示暫時未收到有關消息，仍可幫助客戶執行指令。
渣打報113.8元，升1.8%，成交3160萬元。
SCB 內部已經預料到全球股市將會大鑊所以提前作出步署。
《路透》：渣打結束全球股票業務 炒200人
來源: http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realtime/finance/20150108/53311067
路透》報道，渣打（2888）關閉全球現貨股票業務，將導致全球裁員約200人，另外，同時關閉資本市場業務。
本報消息人士指，渣打股票及衍生工具部目前運作正常，窩輪及牛熊證目前開價亦如常，有關結束全球現貨股票業務的事宜，將於短期內有正式公佈。
本報記者致電渣打股票部熱線查詢，職員表示暫時未收到有關消息，仍可幫助客戶執行指令。
渣打報113.8元，升1.8%，成交3160萬元。《路透》：渣打結束全球股票業務 炒200人
來源: http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realtime/finance/20150108/53311067
路透》報道，渣打（2888）關閉全球現貨股票業務，將導致全球裁員約200人，另外，同時關閉資本市場業務。
本報消息人士指，渣打股票及衍生工具部目前運作正常，窩輪及牛熊證目前開價亦如常，有關結束全球現貨股票業務的事宜，將於短期內有正式公佈。
本報記者致電渣打股票部熱線查詢，職員表示暫時未收到有關消息，仍可幫助客戶執行指令。
渣打報113.8元，升1.8%，成交3160萬元。
SCB 內部已經預料到全球股市將會大鑊所以提前作出步署。
BUY PUT咪發表
《路透》：渣打結束全球股票業務 炒200人
來源: http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realtime/finance/20150108/53311067
路透》報道，渣打（2888）關閉全球現貨股票業務，將導致全球裁員約200人，另外，同時關閉資本市場業務。
本報消息人士指，渣打股票及衍生工具部目前運作正常，窩輪及牛熊證目前開價亦如常，有關結束全球現貨股票業務的事宜，將於短期內有正式公佈。
本報記者致電渣打股票部熱線查詢，職員表示暫時未收到有關消息，仍可幫助客戶執行指令。
渣打報113.8元，升1.8%，成交3160萬元。《路透》：渣打結束全球股票業務 炒200人
來源: http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realtime/finance/20150108/53311067
路透》報道，渣打（2888）關閉全球現貨股票業務，將導致全球裁員約200人，另外，同時關閉資本市場業務。
本報消息人士指，渣打股票及衍生工具部目前運作正常，窩輪及牛熊證目前開價亦如常，有關結束全球現貨股票業務的事宜，將於短期內有正式公佈。
本報記者致電渣打股票部熱線查詢，職員表示暫時未收到有關消息，仍可幫助客戶執行指令。
渣打報113.8元，升1.8%，成交3160萬元。
SCB 內部已經預料到全球股市將會大鑊所以提前作出步署。
BUY PUT咪發達
Automated License Plate Readers Threaten Our Privacy
MAY 6, 2013 | BY JENNIFER LYNCH
Co-Authored with Peter Bibring, Senior Staff Attorney at the ACLU of Southern California
ALPR Camera on Top of Police CarLaw enforcement agencies are increasingly using sophisticated cameras, called “automated license plate readers” or ALPR, to scan and record the license plates of millions of cars across the country. These cameras, mounted on top of patrol cars and on city streets, can scan up to 1,800 license plate per minute, day or night, allowing one squad car to record more than 14,000 plates during the course of a single shift.
[#ff000]Photographing a single license plate one time on a public city street may not seem problematic, but when that data is put into a database, combined with other scans of that same plate on other city streets, and stored forever, it can become very revealing.[/#ff000] Information about your location over time can show not only where you live and work, but [#ff000]your political and religious beliefs[/#ff000], your social and sexual habits, your visits to the doctor, and your associations with others. And, according to recent research reported in Nature, it’s possible to identify 95% of individuals with as few as four randomly selected geospatial datapoints (location + time), making location data the ultimate biometric identifier.
To better gauge the real threat to privacy posed by ALPR, EFF and the ACLU of Southern California asked LAPD and LASD for information on their systems, including their policies on retaining and sharing information and all the license plate data each department collected over the course of a single week in 2012. After both agencies refused to release most of the records we asked for, we sued. We hope to get access to this data, both to show just how much data the agencies are collecting and how revealing it can be.
ALPRs are often touted as an easy way to find stolen cars — the system checks a scanned plate against a database of stolen or wanted cars and can instantly identify a hit, allowing officers to set up a sting to recover the car and catch the thief. But even when there’s no match in the database and no reason to think a car is stolen or involved in a crime, police keep the data. According to the LA Weekly, LAPD and LASD together already have collected more than 160 million “data points” (license plates plus time, date, and exact location) in the greater LA area—that’s more than 20 hits for each of the more than 7 million vehicles registered in L.A. County. That’s a ton of data, but it’s not all — law enforcement officers also have access to private databases containing hundreds of millions of plates and their coordinates collected by “repo” men.
ALPR Monitor Inside Police CarLaw enforcement agencies claim that ALPR systems are no different from an officer recording license plate, time and location information by hand. They also argue the data doesn’t warrant any privacy protections because we drive our cars around in public. However, as five justices of the Supreme Court recognized last year in US v. Jones, a case involving GPS tracking, the ease of data collection and the low cost of data storage make technological surveillance solutions such as GPS or ALPR very different from techniques used in the past.
Police are open about their desire to record the movements of every car in case it might one day prove valuable. In 2008, LAPD Police Chief Charlie Beck (then the agency’s chief of detectives) told GovTech Magazine that ALPRs have “unlimited potential” as an investigative tool. “It’s always going to be great for the black-and-white to be driving down the street and find stolen cars rolling around . . . . But the real value comes from the long-term investigative uses of being able to track vehicles—where they’ve been and what they've been doing—and tie that to crimes that have occurred or that will occur.” But amassing data on the movements of law-abiding residents poses a real threat to privacy, while the benefit to public safety is speculative, at best.
In light of privacy concerns, states including Maine, New Jersey, and Virginia have limited the use of ALPRs, and New Hampshire has banned them outright. Even the International Association of Chiefs of Police has issued a report recognizing that “recording driving habits” could raise First Amendment concerns because cameras could record “vehicles parked at addiction-counseling meetings, doctors' offices, health clinics, or even staging areas for political protests.”
But even if ALPRs are permitted, there are still common-sense limits that can allow the public safety benefits of ALPRs while preventing the wholesale tracking of every resident’s movements. Police can and should treat location information from ALPRs like other sensitive information — they should retain it no longer than necessary to determine if it might be relevant to a crime, and should get a warrant to keep it any longer. They should limit who can access it and who they can share it with. And they should put oversight in place to ensure these limits are followed.
Unfortunately, efforts to impose reasonable limits on ALPR tracking in California have failed so far. Last year, legislation that would have limited private and law enforcement retention of ALPR data to 60 days—a limit currently in effect for the California Highway Patrol — and restricted sharing between law enforcement and private companies failed after vigorous opposition from law enforcement. In California, law enforcement agencies remain free to set their own policies on the use and retention of ALPR data, or to have no policy at all.
Some have asked why we would seek public disclosure of the actual license plate data collected by the police—location-based data that we think is private. But we asked specifically for a narrow slice of data — just a week’s worth — to demonstrate how invasive the technology is. Having the data will allow us to see how frequently some plates have been scanned; where and when, specifically, the cops are scanning plates; and just how many plates can be collected in a large metropolitan area over the course of a single week. Actual data will reveal whether ALPRs are deployed primarily in particular areas of Los Angeles and whether some communities might therefore be much more heavily tracked than others. If this data is too private to give a week’s worth to the public to help inform us how the technology is being used, then isn’t it too private to let the police amass years’ worth of data without a warrant?
After the Boston Marathon bombings, many have argued that the government should take advantage of surveillance technology to collect more data rather than less. But we should not so readily give up the very freedoms that terrorists seek to destroy. We should recognize just how revealing ALPR data is and not be afraid to push our police and legislators for sensible limits to protect our basic right to privacy.
MAY 6, 2013 | BY JENNIFER LYNCH
Co-Authored with Peter Bibring, Senior Staff Attorney at the ACLU of Southern California
ALPR Camera on Top of Police CarLaw enforcement agencies are increasingly using sophisticated cameras, called “automated license plate readers” or ALPR, to scan and record the license plates of millions of cars across the country. These cameras, mounted on top of patrol cars and on city streets, can scan up to 1,800 license plate per minute, day or night, allowing one squad car to record more than 14,000 plates during the course of a single shift.
[#ff000]Photographing a single license plate one time on a public city street may not seem problematic, but when that data is put into a database, combined with other scans of that same plate on other city streets, and stored forever, it can become very revealing.[/#ff000] Information about your location over time can show not only where you live and work, but [#ff000]your political and religious beliefs[/#ff000], your social and sexual habits, your visits to the doctor, and your associations with others. And, according to recent research reported in Nature, it’s possible to identify 95% of individuals with as few as four randomly selected geospatial datapoints (location + time), making location data the ultimate biometric identifier.
To better gauge the real threat to privacy posed by ALPR, EFF and the ACLU of Southern California asked LAPD and LASD for information on their systems, including their policies on retaining and sharing information and all the license plate data each department collected over the course of a single week in 2012. After both agencies refused to release most of the records we asked for, we sued. We hope to get access to this data, both to show just how much data the agencies are collecting and how revealing it can be.
ALPRs are often touted as an easy way to find stolen cars — the system checks a scanned plate against a database of stolen or wanted cars and can instantly identify a hit, allowing officers to set up a sting to recover the car and catch the thief. But even when there’s no match in the database and no reason to think a car is stolen or involved in a crime, police keep the data. According to the LA Weekly, LAPD and LASD together already have collected more than 160 million “data points” (license plates plus time, date, and exact location) in the greater LA area—that’s more than 20 hits for each of the more than 7 million vehicles registered in L.A. County. That’s a ton of data, but it’s not all — law enforcement officers also have access to private databases containing hundreds of millions of plates and their coordinates collected by “repo” men.
ALPR Monitor Inside Police CarLaw enforcement agencies claim that ALPR systems are no different from an officer recording license plate, time and location information by hand. They also argue the data doesn’t warrant any privacy protections because we drive our cars around in public. However, as five justices of the Supreme Court recognized last year in US v. Jones, a case involving GPS tracking, the ease of data collection and the low cost of data storage make technological surveillance solutions such as GPS or ALPR very different from techniques used in the past.
Police are open about their desire to record the movements of every car in case it might one day prove valuable. In 2008, LAPD Police Chief Charlie Beck (then the agency’s chief of detectives) told GovTech Magazine that ALPRs have “unlimited potential” as an investigative tool. “It’s always going to be great for the black-and-white to be driving down the street and find stolen cars rolling around . . . . But the real value comes from the long-term investigative uses of being able to track vehicles—where they’ve been and what they've been doing—and tie that to crimes that have occurred or that will occur.” But amassing data on the movements of law-abiding residents poses a real threat to privacy, while the benefit to public safety is speculative, at best.
In light of privacy concerns, states including Maine, New Jersey, and Virginia have limited the use of ALPRs, and New Hampshire has banned them outright. Even the International Association of Chiefs of Police has issued a report recognizing that “recording driving habits” could raise First Amendment concerns because cameras could record “vehicles parked at addiction-counseling meetings, doctors' offices, health clinics, or even staging areas for political protests.”
But even if ALPRs are permitted, there are still common-sense limits that can allow the public safety benefits of ALPRs while preventing the wholesale tracking of every resident’s movements. Police can and should treat location information from ALPRs like other sensitive information — they should retain it no longer than necessary to determine if it might be relevant to a crime, and should get a warrant to keep it any longer. They should limit who can access it and who they can share it with. And they should put oversight in place to ensure these limits are followed.
Unfortunately, efforts to impose reasonable limits on ALPR tracking in California have failed so far. Last year, legislation that would have limited private and law enforcement retention of ALPR data to 60 days—a limit currently in effect for the California Highway Patrol — and restricted sharing between law enforcement and private companies failed after vigorous opposition from law enforcement. In California, law enforcement agencies remain free to set their own policies on the use and retention of ALPR data, or to have no policy at all.
Some have asked why we would seek public disclosure of the actual license plate data collected by the police—location-based data that we think is private. But we asked specifically for a narrow slice of data — just a week’s worth — to demonstrate how invasive the technology is. Having the data will allow us to see how frequently some plates have been scanned; where and when, specifically, the cops are scanning plates; and just how many plates can be collected in a large metropolitan area over the course of a single week. Actual data will reveal whether ALPRs are deployed primarily in particular areas of Los Angeles and whether some communities might therefore be much more heavily tracked than others. If this data is too private to give a week’s worth to the public to help inform us how the technology is being used, then isn’t it too private to let the police amass years’ worth of data without a warrant?
After the Boston Marathon bombings, many have argued that the government should take advantage of surveillance technology to collect more data rather than less. But we should not so readily give up the very freedoms that terrorists seek to destroy. We should recognize just how revealing ALPR data is and not be afraid to push our police and legislators for sensible limits to protect our basic right to privacy.
《路透》：渣打結束全球股票業務 炒200人
來源: http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realtime/finance/20150108/53311067
路透》報道，渣打（2888）關閉全球現貨股票業務，將導致全球裁員約200人，另外，同時關閉資本市場業務。
本報消息人士指，渣打股票及衍生工具部目前運作正常，窩輪及牛熊證目前開價亦如常，有關結束全球現貨股票業務的事宜，將於短期內有正式公佈。
本報記者致電渣打股票部熱線查詢，職員表示暫時未收到有關消息，仍可幫助客戶執行指令。
渣打報113.8元，升1.8%，成交3160萬元。《路透》：渣打結束全球股票業務 炒200人
來源: http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realtime/finance/20150108/53311067
路透》報道，渣打（2888）關閉全球現貨股票業務，將導致全球裁員約200人，另外，同時關閉資本市場業務。
本報消息人士指，渣打股票及衍生工具部目前運作正常，窩輪及牛熊證目前開價亦如常，有關結束全球現貨股票業務的事宜，將於短期內有正式公佈。
本報記者致電渣打股票部熱線查詢，職員表示暫時未收到有關消息，仍可幫助客戶執行指令。
渣打報113.8元，升1.8%，成交3160萬元。
SCB 內部已經預料到全球股市將會大鑊所以提前作出步署。
風聲傳出好快到 HSBC，而且係大裁員
《路透》：渣打結束全球股票業務 炒200人
來源: http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realtime/finance/20150108/53311067
路透》報道，渣打（2888）關閉全球現貨股票業務，將導致全球裁員約200人，另外，同時關閉資本市場業務。
本報消息人士指，渣打股票及衍生工具部目前運作正常，窩輪及牛熊證目前開價亦如常，有關結束全球現貨股票業務的事宜，將於短期內有正式公佈。
本報記者致電渣打股票部熱線查詢，職員表示暫時未收到有關消息，仍可幫助客戶執行指令。
渣打報113.8元，升1.8%，成交3160萬元。《路透》：渣打結束全球股票業務 炒200人
來源: http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realtime/finance/20150108/53311067
路透》報道，渣打（2888）關閉全球現貨股票業務，將導致全球裁員約200人，另外，同時關閉資本市場業務。
本報消息人士指，渣打股票及衍生工具部目前運作正常，窩輪及牛熊證目前開價亦如常，有關結束全球現貨股票業務的事宜，將於短期內有正式公佈。
本報記者致電渣打股票部熱線查詢，職員表示暫時未收到有關消息，仍可幫助客戶執行指令。
渣打報113.8元，升1.8%，成交3160萬元。
SCB 內部已經預料到全球股市將會大鑊所以提前作出步署。
風聲傳出好快到 HSBC，而且係大裁員
HSBC 大鑊在銀行界已經通晒天，就連英國政府都救唔到佢，現在只得香港市民盲目撐 HSBC 但唔知可以撐得幾耐，可是 HSBC 董事會仍然站在英國位置希望下屆英國首相能夠幫忙；最終大裁員一定有很多香港員工被放棄。
《路透》：渣打結束全球股票業務 炒200人
來源: http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realtime/finance/20150108/53311067
路透》報道，渣打（2888）關閉全球現貨股票業務，將導致全球裁員約200人，另外，同時關閉資本市場業務。
本報消息人士指，渣打股票及衍生工具部目前運作正常，窩輪及牛熊證目前開價亦如常，有關結束全球現貨股票業務的事宜，將於短期內有正式公佈。
本報記者致電渣打股票部熱線查詢，職員表示暫時未收到有關消息，仍可幫助客戶執行指令。
渣打報113.8元，升1.8%，成交3160萬元。《路透》：渣打結束全球股票業務 炒200人
來源: http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realtime/finance/20150108/53311067
路透》報道，渣打（2888）關閉全球現貨股票業務，將導致全球裁員約200人，另外，同時關閉資本市場業務。
本報消息人士指，渣打股票及衍生工具部目前運作正常，窩輪及牛熊證目前開價亦如常，有關結束全球現貨股票業務的事宜，將於短期內有正式公佈。
本報記者致電渣打股票部熱線查詢，職員表示暫時未收到有關消息，仍可幫助客戶執行指令。
渣打報113.8元，升1.8%，成交3160萬元。
SCB 內部已經預料到全球股市將會大鑊所以提前作出步署。
BUY PUT咪發達
股市唔同嘅，作為老散比你「知道」有野發生唔代表買左PUT就發，上次雷曼其實都好多人知會爆，個市愈升愈PUT，咪玩到32000，殺曬D淡友先囉，時間點都係由造市果班話事。
秒後自動載入第 31 頁
| 上一頁 | 下一頁 |
| 發表 |