| 發表文章 | 發起投票 |
| 上一頁 |
超商「便當提袋」 日網友讚:革命性發明
本貼文共有 32 個回覆
此貼文已鎖,將不接受回覆
把撚
用料小環保d
唔用會唔會仲好d
乜撚都唔好用,唔好用水電煤,斬柴生火訓草地就最撚環保![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
一黎就用最極端既答案,同呢啲人討論簡直浪費時間![]()
我就係想講唔用已經係一個極端既例子, 人地係要用手提, 我話用小D原料去造個手提, 佢走去同我講唔好用
把撚
用料小環保d
唔用會唔會仲好d
乜撚都唔好用,唔好用水電煤,斬柴生火訓草地就最撚環保![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
支持環保吹
把撚
用料小環保d
唔用會唔會仲好d
乜撚都唔好用,唔好用水電煤,斬柴生火訓草地就最撚環保![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
一黎就用最極端既答案,同呢啲人討論簡直浪費時間![]()
我就係想講唔用已經係一個極端既例子, 人地係要用手提, 我話用小D原料去造個手提, 佢走去同我講唔好用![]()
咪就係,都唔知係邊個一黎就用最極端既答案
fixed size![]()
飯盒長方形又得唔得?
supermarket應該固定咗用開嗰個shape
把撚
用料小環保d
唔用會唔會仲好d
乜撚都唔好用,唔好用水電煤,斬柴生火訓草地就最撚環保![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
一黎就用最極端既答案,同呢啲人討論簡直浪費時間![]()
我就係想講唔用已經係一個極端既例子, 人地係要用手提, 我話用小D原料去造個手提, 佢走去同我講唔好用![]()
咪就係,都唔知係邊個一黎就用最極端既答案![]()
![]()
但係呢個先係真正解決到既方法
把撚
用料小環保d
唔用會唔會仲好d
乜撚都唔好用,唔好用水電煤,斬柴生火訓草地就最撚環保![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
carbon footprint 0
燒柴又點會carbon footprint 0 呢?
你傻咗?![]()
你挑我機?
Wood fuel is classified as carbon neutral fuel which means that it has net zero carbon footprint.
潛ed?
| 上一頁 |
| 發表 |
